public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Justin Sanders <justin@coraid.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Xianting Tian <xianting_tian@126.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fix block device size update serialization v2
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:47:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200827074758.GA8009@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200823091043.2600261-1-hch@lst.de>

Jens, can you consider this for 5.9?  It reliably fixes the reported
hangs with nvme hotremoval that we've had for a few releases.

On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 11:10:40AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> this series fixes how we update i_size for the block device inodes (and
> thus the block device).  Different helpers use two different locks
> (bd_mutex and i_rwsem) to protect the update, and it appears device
> mapper uses yet another internal lock.  A lot of the drivers do the
> update handcrafted in often crufty ways.  And in addition to that mess
> it turns out that the "main" lock, bd_mutex is pretty dead lock prone
> vs other spots in the block layer that acquire it during revalidation
> operations, as reported by Xianting.
> 
> Fix all that by adding a dedicated spinlock just for the size updates.
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  - don't call __invalidate_device under the new spinlock
>  - don't call into the file system code from the nvme removal code
---end quoted text---

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-27  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-23  9:10 fix block device size update serialization v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-23  9:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: replace bd_set_size with bd_set_nr_sectors Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-24  8:25   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-23  9:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: fix locking for struct block_device size updates Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-24  7:36   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-24  8:26   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-23  9:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: don't call revalidate_disk from nvme_set_queue_dying Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-24  7:37   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-24  8:26   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-27  7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-08-29 16:47   ` fix block device size update serialization v2 Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200827074758.GA8009@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hoeppner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=justin@coraid.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
    --cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=xianting_tian@126.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox