From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82365C433E1 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF9720786 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 07:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728372AbgH0HsE (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:48:04 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:37012 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726851AbgH0HsD (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:48:03 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id EC6DB68C65; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:47:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:47:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Justin Sanders , Josef Bacik , Xianting Tian , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Stefan Haberland , Jan Hoeppner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fix block device size update serialization v2 Message-ID: <20200827074758.GA8009@lst.de> References: <20200823091043.2600261-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200823091043.2600261-1-hch@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens, can you consider this for 5.9? It reliably fixes the reported hangs with nvme hotremoval that we've had for a few releases. On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 11:10:40AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Jens, > > this series fixes how we update i_size for the block device inodes (and > thus the block device). Different helpers use two different locks > (bd_mutex and i_rwsem) to protect the update, and it appears device > mapper uses yet another internal lock. A lot of the drivers do the > update handcrafted in often crufty ways. And in addition to that mess > it turns out that the "main" lock, bd_mutex is pretty dead lock prone > vs other spots in the block layer that acquire it during revalidation > operations, as reported by Xianting. > > Fix all that by adding a dedicated spinlock just for the size updates. > > Changes since v1: > - don't call __invalidate_device under the new spinlock > - don't call into the file system code from the nvme removal code ---end quoted text---