From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Drop unnecessary check frmo dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:14:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200827121449.GA21147@gerhold.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88c8522b556d15bd44b8388d47cf25ac6f06b057.1598522635.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 03:35:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Since commit c0ab9e0812da ("opp: Allocate genpd_virt_devs from
> dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd()"), the allocation of the virtual devices is
> moved to dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() and this check isn't required anymore
> as it will always fail. Drop it.
>
Only partially related to this patch, but actually I noticed that
dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() does not work correctly if it is called
multiple times.
For example, qcom-cpufreq-nvmem calls this for every CPU because it is
not aware that the OPP table is shared between the CPUs.
dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() does not check if opp_table->genpd_virt_devs
is already set, so when it is called again for other CPUs we will:
- Cause a memory leak (opp_table->genpd_virt_devs is just replaced
with new memory)
- Attach the power domains multiple times
- Never detach the power domains from earlier calls
- Crash when dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd() is called the second time
Oh well. :)
I think the function should just return and do nothing if the power
domains were already attached, just like dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw()
etc. But this is a bit complicated to implement with the "virt_devs"
parameter, since callers will probably assume that to be valid if we
return success.
Another advantage of my proposal to remove the virt_devs parameter [1] :)
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-27 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-27 10:05 [PATCH] opp: Drop unnecessary check frmo dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() Viresh Kumar
2020-08-27 12:14 ` Stephan Gerhold [this message]
2020-08-31 5:51 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200827121449.GA21147@gerhold.net \
--to=stephan@gerhold.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox