From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E63C433E2 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0023920BED for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="QFUVyj8d" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728825AbgH3Luj (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 07:50:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52588 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728691AbgH3Lug (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 07:50:36 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1D6AC061573 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f296000a06db95d0950e717.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f29:6000:a06d:b95d:950:e717]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 96A441EC0281; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 13:50:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1598788229; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=H+3IIcxD1FEunqGmhWLq31uvRsaYsBBpUYC2R5ejKsY=; b=QFUVyj8dJLSoUh4GiV1jPe7aL+JEtsdBVRaGWzB7TZk+BG3D+w2TUmVYzRPEhlyyTO9CN0 hKZoTsWLr89PKuxdhpV+wFnTMHpU0fz9FValfaVp3EbBrVliz9sTHtNxLiKW1Y1S1r2Poc DM6LRUtTdSOM9RW+Xow0AeCVGckcInA= Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 13:50:24 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Kyung Min Park Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, tony.luck@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, ricardo.neri@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ak@linux.intel.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, Ricardo Neri Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/x86: Add documentation for /proc/cpuinfo feature flags Message-ID: <20200830115024.GA4297@zn.tnic> References: <20200824180412.9440-1-kyung.min.park@intel.com> <20200828184209.GC19342@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 03:30:32PM -0700, Kyung Min Park wrote: > Should I mention the tool specifically although the tool is WIP? Well, if you wanna look at it that way, the whole kernel is constantly and forever WIP. :-) Also, if there's some functionality missing, pointing to it might make people send patches. > As you commented previously, should I use > tools/arch/x86/tools/cpuid/cpuid as the future tool and its location? Yeah, let's just drop the second "tools", i.e., tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/ or so should be good enough. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette