From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: Avoid oops when bdi->io_pages==0
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:56:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200831165659.GH14765@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4010690f-20ad-f7ba-b595-2e07b0fa2d94@kernel.dk>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:39:26AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We really should ensure that ->io_pages is always set, imho, instead of
> having to work-around it in other spots.
Interestingly, there are only three places in the entire kernel which
_use_ bdi->io_pages. FAT, Verity and the pagecache readahead code.
Verity:
unsigned long num_ra_pages =
min_t(unsigned long, num_blocks_to_hash - i,
inode->i_sb->s_bdi->io_pages);
FAT:
if (ra_pages > sb->s_bdi->io_pages)
ra_pages = rounddown(ra_pages, sb->s_bdi->io_pages);
Pagecache:
max_pages = max_t(unsigned long, bdi->io_pages, ra->ra_pages);
and
if (req_size > max_pages && bdi->io_pages > max_pages)
max_pages = min(req_size, bdi->io_pages);
The funny thing is that all three are using it differently. Verity is
taking io_pages to be the maximum amount to readahead. FAT is using
it as the unit of readahead (round down to the previous multiple) and
the pagecache uses it to limit reads that exceed the current per-file
readahead limit (but allows per-file readahead to exceed io_pages,
in which case it has no effect).
So how should it be used? My inclination is to say that the pagecache
is right, by virtue of being the most-used.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-31 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-30 0:59 [PATCH] fat: Avoid oops when bdi->io_pages==0 OGAWA Hirofumi
2020-08-30 1:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-08-30 1:54 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2020-08-30 3:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-08-30 9:04 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2020-08-30 14:01 ` Sasha Levin
2020-08-30 14:16 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2020-08-31 15:22 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-31 16:37 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2020-08-31 16:39 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-31 16:56 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-08-31 17:00 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-31 17:39 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2020-08-31 17:16 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2020-08-31 17:19 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200831165659.GH14765@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox