From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: antoniprzybylik <antoni.przybylik@wp.pl>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: fixed two macros by adding brackets
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:56:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200831175659.GA2556308@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200831160332.8507-1-antoni.przybylik@wp.pl>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 06:03:32PM +0200, antoniprzybylik wrote:
> Added brackets to two macros.
That says _what_ you did, but not _why_ you did it.
Why did you do it? What does this fix?
Does it make sense to do this?
And why these two macros? Be specific please.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoni Przybylik <antoni.przybylik@wp.pl>
> ---
> drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c | 3 +--
> drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> index 6e813693a766..5cd94347bf78 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>
> #define MUX_TX_MAX_SIZE 2048
>
> -#define GDM_TTY_READY(gdm) (gdm && gdm->tty_dev && gdm->port.count)
> +#define GDM_TTY_READY(gdm) ((gdm) && (gdm)->tty_dev && (gdm)->port.count)
>
> static struct tty_driver *gdm_driver[TTY_MAX_COUNT];
> static struct gdm *gdm_table[TTY_MAX_COUNT][GDM_TTY_MINOR];
> @@ -323,4 +323,3 @@ void unregister_lte_tty_driver(void)
> }
> }
> }
> -
You also deleted a line without saying so :(
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> index 7902e52a699b..399b7b4b536f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(netlink_mutex);
> #define ND_NLMSG_DATA(nlh) ((void *)((char *)NLMSG_DATA(nlh) + \
> ND_IFINDEX_LEN))
> #define ND_NLMSG_S_LEN(len) (len + ND_IFINDEX_LEN)
> -#define ND_NLMSG_R_LEN(nlh) (nlh->nlmsg_len - ND_IFINDEX_LEN)
> +#define ND_NLMSG_R_LEN(nlh) ((nlh)->nlmsg_len - ND_IFINDEX_LEN)
Does that really make sense to change?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-31 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-31 16:03 [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: fixed two macros by adding brackets antoniprzybylik
2020-08-31 17:56 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200831175659.GA2556308@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=antoni.przybylik@wp.pl \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox