From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] exit: support non-blocking pidfds
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:11:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901161154.GA4386@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200831134551.1599689-3-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
On 08/31, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -934,6 +934,7 @@ struct wait_opts {
>
> wait_queue_entry_t child_wait;
> int notask_error;
> + int eagain_error;
> };
>
> static int eligible_pid(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
> @@ -1461,6 +1462,8 @@ static long do_wait(struct wait_opts *wo)
>
> notask:
> retval = wo->notask_error;
> + if (!retval)
> + retval = wo->eagain_error;
> if (!retval && !(wo->wo_flags & WNOHANG)) {
> retval = -ERESTARTSYS;
I must have missed something but I don't understand why do we need
the new ->eagain_error and the change in do_wait().
> @@ -1544,6 +1551,11 @@ static long kernel_waitid(int which, pid_t upid, struct waitid_info *infop,
> wo.wo_flags = options;
> wo.wo_info = infop;
> wo.wo_rusage = ru;
> + wo.eagain_error = 0;
> + if (f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
> + wo.wo_flags |= WNOHANG;
> + wo.eagain_error = -EAGAIN;
> + }
> ret = do_wait(&wo);
Can't kernel_waitid() simply do
if (f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
wo.wo_flags |= WNOHANG;
ret = do_wait();
if (!ret & (f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
ret = -EAGAIN;
?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-01 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-31 13:45 [PATCH 0/4] Support non-blocking pidfds Christian Brauner
2020-08-31 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] pidfd: support PIDFD_NONBLOCK in pidfd_open() Christian Brauner
2020-09-01 16:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-01 16:33 ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-01 16:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-08-31 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] exit: support non-blocking pidfds Christian Brauner
2020-09-01 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2020-09-01 16:18 ` Christian Brauner
2020-08-31 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] tests: port pidfd_wait to kselftest harness Christian Brauner
2020-08-31 13:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] tests: add waitid() tests for non-blocking pidfds Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200901161154.GA4386@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox