From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] perf bench: fix return value check in do_run_multi_threaded()
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:54:51 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200903185451.GF3495158@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200903185301.GE3495158@kernel.org>
Em Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:53:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 10:05:26PM +0800, YueHaibing escreveu:
> > In case of error, the function perf_session__new() returns ERR_PTR()
> > and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check
> > should be replaced with IS_ERR()
> >
> > Fixes: 13edc237200c ("perf bench: Add a multi-threaded synthesize benchmark")
> > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>
> Thanks, applied, kudos for adding the Fixes: tag, appreciated!
But...
> > ---
> > tools/perf/bench/synthesize.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/synthesize.c b/tools/perf/bench/synthesize.c
> > index 8d624aea1c5e..e39daa609db2 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/bench/synthesize.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/bench/synthesize.c
> > @@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ static int do_run_multi_threaded(struct target *target,
> > init_stats(&event_stats);
> > for (i = 0; i < multi_iterations; i++) {
> > session = perf_session__new(NULL, false, NULL);
> > - if (!session)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > + if (IS_ERR(session)) {
> > + return PTR_ERR(session);
This doesn't compile, so I take back that kudo ;-\
I'm fixing this by removing that needless '{'.
Please be more careful,
- Arnaldo
> >
> > atomic_set(&event_count, 0);
> > gettimeofday(&start, NULL);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-03 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 14:05 [PATCH -next] perf bench: fix return value check in do_run_multi_threaded() YueHaibing
2020-09-02 16:09 ` Ian Rogers
2020-09-03 18:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-03 18:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2020-09-03 18:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-04 13:25 ` Yuehaibing
2020-09-04 16:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200903185451.GF3495158@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox