public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] openrisc: Fix issue with get_user for 64-bit values
Date: Sat,  5 Sep 2020 22:19:35 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200905131935.972386-4-shorne@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200905131935.972386-1-shorne@gmail.com>

A build failure was raised by kbuild with the following error.

    drivers/android/binder.c: Assembler messages:
    drivers/android/binder.c:3861: Error: unrecognized keyword/register name `l.lwz ?ap,4(r24)'
    drivers/android/binder.c:3866: Error: unrecognized keyword/register name `l.addi ?ap,r0,0'

The issue is with 64-bit get_user() calls on openrisc.  I traced this to
a problem where in the internally in the get_user macros there is a cast
to long __gu_val this causes GCC to think the get_user call is 32-bit.
This binder code is really long and GCC allocates register r30, which
triggers the issue. The 64-bit get_user asm tries to get the 64-bit pair
register, which for r30 overflows the general register names and returns
the dummy register ?ap.

The fix is to just remove the assignment to the 32-bit temporary
variable __gu_val.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202008200453.ohnhqkjQ%25lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
---
 arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index f0390211236b..4a8976dda1a5 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -165,19 +165,19 @@ struct __large_struct {
 
 #define __get_user_nocheck(x, ptr, size)			\
 ({								\
-	long __gu_err, __gu_val;				\
-	__get_user_size(__gu_val, (ptr), (size), __gu_err);	\
-	(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val;		\
+	long __gu_err;						\
+	__get_user_size((x), (ptr), (size), __gu_err);		\
 	__gu_err;						\
 })
 
 #define __get_user_check(x, ptr, size)					\
 ({									\
-	long __gu_err = -EFAULT, __gu_val = 0;				\
+	long __gu_err = -EFAULT;					\
 	const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);		\
-	if (access_ok(__gu_addr, size))			\
-		__get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, (size), __gu_err);	\
-	(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val;			\
+	if (access_ok(__gu_addr, size))					\
+		__get_user_size((x), __gu_addr, (size), __gu_err);	\
+	else								\
+		(x) = 0;						\
 	__gu_err;							\
 })
 
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ do {									\
 	case 2: __get_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, "l.lhz"); break;		\
 	case 4: __get_user_asm(x, ptr, retval, "l.lwz"); break;		\
 	case 8: __get_user_asm2(x, ptr, retval); break;			\
-	default: (x) = __get_user_bad();				\
+	default: (x) = (__typeof__(x)) __get_user_bad();		\
 	}								\
 } while (0)
 
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-05 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-05 13:19 [PATCH v2 0/3] OpenRISC fixes for 5.9 Stafford Horne
2020-09-05 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] openrisc: Reserve memblock for initrd Stafford Horne
2020-09-05 13:25   ` Stafford Horne
2020-09-06  6:15   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-09-05 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] openrisc: Fix cache API compile issue when not inlining Stafford Horne
2020-09-05 13:19 ` Stafford Horne [this message]
2020-09-05 13:57   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] openrisc: Fix issue with get_user for 64-bit values Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-09-05 21:34     ` Stafford Horne
2020-09-06  0:22       ` [OpenRISC] " Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-09-06 21:00         ` Stafford Horne
2020-09-05 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] OpenRISC fixes for 5.9 Stafford Horne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200905131935.972386-4-shorne@gmail.com \
    --to=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox