public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	marex@denx.de, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: mxsfb: check framebuffer pitch
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 20:18:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200907181855.GE2352366@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200907161712.GF6047@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:17:12PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 06:03:43PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > The lcdif IP does not support a framebuffer pitch (stride) other than
> > the CRTC width. Check for equality and reject the state otherwise.
> > 
> > This prevents a distorted picture when using 640x800 and running the
> > Mesa graphics stack. Mesa tires to use a cache aligned stride, which
> 
> s/tires/tries/
> 
> > leads at that particular resolution to width != stride. Currently
> > Mesa has no fallback behavior, but rejecting this configuration allows
> > userspace to handle the issue correctly.
> 
> I'm increasingly impressed by how featureful this IP core is :-)
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_kms.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_kms.c
> > index b721b8b262ce..79aa14027f91 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_kms.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_kms.c
> > @@ -403,14 +403,28 @@ static int mxsfb_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> >  {
> >  	struct mxsfb_drm_private *mxsfb = to_mxsfb_drm_private(plane->dev);
> >  	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > +	unsigned int pitch;
> > +	int ret;
> >  
> >  	crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(plane_state->state,
> >  						   &mxsfb->crtc);
> >  
> > -	return drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(plane_state, crtc_state,
> > -						   DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING,
> > -						   DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING,
> > -						   false, true);
> > +	ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(plane_state, crtc_state,
> > +						  DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING,
> > +						  DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING,
> > +						  false, true);
> > +	if (ret || !plane_state->visible)
> 
> Would it be more explict to check for !plane_state->fb ? Otherwise I'll
> have to verify that !fb always implies !visible :-)
> 
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	pitch = crtc_state->mode.hdisplay *
> > +		plane_state->fb->format->cpp[0];
> 
> This holds on a single line.
> 
> > +	if (plane_state->fb->pitches[0] != pitch) {
> > +		dev_err(plane->dev->dev,
> > +			"Invalid pitch: fb and crtc widths must be the same");
> 
> I'd turn this into a dev_dbg(), printing error messages to the kernel
> log in response to user-triggered conditions is a bit too verbose and
> could flood the log.
> 
> Wouldn't it be best to catch this issue when creating the framebuffer ?

Yeah this should be verified at addfb time. We try to validate as early as
possible.
-Daniel

> 
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void mxsfb_plane_primary_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-07 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-07 16:03 [PATCH] drm: mxsfb: check framebuffer pitch Stefan Agner
2020-09-07 16:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-09-07 18:18   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-09-08  7:55     ` Stefan Agner
2020-09-08  8:18       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-09-08  8:48         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-08 12:07           ` Stefan Agner
2020-09-08 12:29             ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-08 12:33               ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-09-08 12:49                 ` Stefan Agner
2020-09-08 12:07           ` Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200907181855.GE2352366@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox