From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: add a singleton check for vfio_group_pin_pages
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:30:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916013025.GA18827@joy-OptiPlex-7040> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915133011.1e3652ee@x1.home>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:30:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:03:01 -0600
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:30:42 +0800
> > Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > vfio_pin_pages() and vfio_group_pin_pages() are used purely to mark dirty
> > > pages to devices with IOMMU backend as they already have all VM pages
> > > pinned at VM startup.
> >
> > This is wrong. The entire initial basis of mdev devices is for
> > non-IOMMU backed devices which provide mediation outside of the scope
> > of the IOMMU. That mediation includes interpreting device DMA
> > programming and making use of the vfio_pin_pages() interface to
> > translate and pin IOVA address to HPA. Marking pages dirty is a
> > secondary feature.
> >
> > > when there're multiple devices in the vfio group, the dirty pages
> > > marked through pin_pages interface by one device is not useful as the
> > > other devices may access and dirty any VM pages.
> >
> > I don't know of any cases where there are multiple devices in a group
> > that would make use of this interface, however, all devices within a
> > group necessarily share an IOMMU context and any one device dirtying a
> > page will dirty that page for all devices, so I don't see that this is
> > a valid statement either.
> >
> > > So added a check such that only singleton IOMMU groups can pin pages
> > > in vfio_group_pin_pages. for mdevs, there's always only one dev in a
> > > vfio group.
> > > This is a fix to the commit below that added a singleton IOMMU group
> > > check in vfio_pin_pages.
> >
> > None of the justification above is accurate, please try again. Thanks,
>
> FWIW, I think this should read something like "Page pinning is used
> both to translate and pin device mappings for DMA purpose, as well as
> to indicate to the IOMMU backend to limit the dirty page scope to those
> pages that have been pinned, in the case of an IOMMU backed device. To
> support this, the vfio_pin_pages() interface limits itself to only
> singleton groups such that the IOMMU backend can consider dirty page
> scope only at the group level. Implement the same requirement for the
> vfio_group_pin_pages() interface." Thanks,
>
yes, I'm sorry that I didn't express the meaning clearly.
will resend it using this version.
Thanks
Yan
>
>
> > > Fixes: 95fc87b44104 (vfio: Selective dirty page tracking if IOMMU backed
> > > device pins pages)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> > > index 5e6e0511b5aa..2f0fa272ebf2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> > > @@ -2053,6 +2053,9 @@ int vfio_group_pin_pages(struct vfio_group *group,
> > > if (!group || !user_iova_pfn || !phys_pfn || !npage)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > + if (group->dev_counter > 1)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > if (npage > VFIO_PIN_PAGES_MAX_ENTRIES)
> > > return -E2BIG;
> > >
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 0:30 [PATCH] vfio: add a singleton check for vfio_group_pin_pages Yan Zhao
2020-09-15 19:03 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-15 19:30 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-16 1:30 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200916013025.GA18827@joy-OptiPlex-7040 \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox