Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: simplify virt_addr_valid call

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 07:47:19AM -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> 
> Reviewing sram_write_dma_safe(), there are two
> identical calls to virt_addr_valid().  The second
> call can be simplified by a comparison of variables
> set from the first call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
> index 22d3b684f04f..c99adb0c99f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int sram_write_dma_safe(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u32 addr, const u8 *buf,
>  		tmp = buf;
>  	}
>  	ret = sram_buf_write(wdev, addr, tmp, len);
> -	if (!virt_addr_valid(buf))
> +	if (tmp != buf)
>  		kfree(tmp);
>  	return ret;
>  }

Jerome, any thoughts?

thanks,

greg k-h