Re: [PATCH v7 12/34] i2c: tegra: Use clk-bulk helpers

Dmitry Osipenko
2020-09-17T15:04:28Z

17.09.2020 14:38, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:39:44AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Use clk-bulk helpers and factor out clocks initialization into separate
>> function in order to make code cleaner.
>>
>> The clocks initialization now performed after reset-control initialization
>> in order to avoid a noisy -PROBE_DEFER errors on T186+ from the clk-bulk
>> helper which doesn't silence this error code. Hence reset_control_get()
>> now may return -EPROBE_DEFER on newer Tegra SoCs because they use BPMP
>> driver that provides reset controls and BPMP doesn't come up early during
>> boot. Previously rst was protected by the clocks retrieval and now this
>> patch makes dev_err_probe() to be used for the rst error handling.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 187 ++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
>
> This is tempting from a diffstat point of view, but the downside is that
> we can now no longer validate that all of the necessary clocks are given
> in device tree.
>
> Previously the driver would fail to probe the I2C controller if any of
> the expected clocks were not defined in device tree, but now it's just
> going to continue without it and not give any indication as to what's
> wrong.

The clocks can't be missed randomly in a device-tree because they are a
part of the core tegra.dtsi

The tegra-i2c DT binding isn't converted to YAML, but once it will be,
then the dtbs_check will tell you about such obvious problems like a
missing mandatory property.

Even if clock is missing, then you won't miss this problem since I2C
shouldn't work in that case.

There is a Qualcomm I2C driver that already uses clk_bulk_get_all() and
doesn't worry about "accidentally" missing clocks.

It's still possible to add the clk-num checking, but it should be
unpractical. We could always add it later on if there will be a real
incident. Do you agree?