From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Eli Cohen <eli@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/8] Cleanup and fix the CMA state machine
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:33:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917123316.GA113655@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200902081122.745412-1-leon@kernel.org>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:11:14AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
> >From Jason:
>
> The RDMA CMA continues to attract syzkaller bugs due to its somewhat loose
> operation of its FSM. Audit and scrub the whole thing to follow modern
> expectations.
>
> Overall the design elements are broadly:
>
> - The ULP entry points MUST NOT run in parallel with each other. The ULP
> is solely responsible for preventing this.
>
> - If the ULP returns !0 from it's event callback it MUST guarentee that no
> other ULP threads are touching the cm_id or calling into any RDMA CM
> entry point.
>
> - ULP entry points can sometimes run conurrently with handler callbacks,
> although it is tricky because there are many entry points that exist
> in the flow before the handler is registered.
>
> - Some ULP entry points are called from the ULP event handler callback,
> under the handler_mutex. (however ucma never does this)
>
> - state uses a weird double locking scheme, in most cases one should hold
> the handler_mutex. (It is somewhat unclear what exactly the spinlock is
> for)
>
> - Reading the state without holding the spinlock should use READ_ONCE,
> even if the handler_mutex is held.
>
> - There are certain states which are 'stable' under the handler_mutex,
> exit from that state requires also holding the handler_mutex. This
> explains why testing the test under only the handler_mutex makes sense.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jason Gunthorpe (8):
> RDMA/cma: Fix locking for the RDMA_CM_CONNECT state
> RDMA/cma: Make the locking for automatic state transition more clear
> RDMA/cma: Fix locking for the RDMA_CM_LISTEN state
> RDMA/cma: Remove cma_comp()
> RDMA/cma: Combine cma_ndev_work with cma_work
> RDMA/cma: Remove dead code for kernel rdmacm multicast
> RDMA/cma: Consolidate the destruction of a cma_multicast in one place
> RDMA/cma: Fix use after free race in roce multicast join
Applied to for-next
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 8:11 [PATCH rdma-next 0/8] Cleanup and fix the CMA state machine Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-17 12:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200917123316.GA113655@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=eli@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rolandd@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox