From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] media: usb: uvc: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:37:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917123757.GC3969@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917123426.GA3595353@kroah.com>
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:34:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 03:25:50PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 02:47:19AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 03:36:08PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > > > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > > > never do something different based on this.
> > >
> > > Is there no value in warning the user that something went wrong ? Silent
> > > failures are harder to debug.
> >
> > Could yous share your opinion about this ?
>
> For debugfs, this isn't an issue, what can a user do with something like
> "debugfs isn't working? What does that mean???"
>
> And if we _really_ want warnings like this, it should go into the
> debugfs core, not require this to be done for every debugfs user, right?
>
> debugfs is just there for kernel developers to help debug things, it's
> not a dependancy on any userspace functionality, so if it works or not
> should not be an issue for any user.
>
> Unless that user is a kernel developer of course :)
Exactly my point :-)
I'm fine moving the error message to the debugfs core itself instead of
duplicating it in drivers. Maybe it's already there though, I haven't
checked. Not printing any message isn't a great idea in my opinion, it
makes debugging more difficult. I can't count the number of times where
I've had to add printk's and recompile the kernel to debug issues that
really should have generated at least a dev_dbg().
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-18 13:36 [PATCH 1/7] media: cec: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-18 13:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] media: coda: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-18 13:56 ` Philipp Zabel
2020-08-18 13:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] media: exynos4-is: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-18 13:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] media: mtk-vpu: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-18 13:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] media: sti: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-18 13:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] media: radio: si476x: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-18 13:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] media: usb: uvc: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-18 23:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-09-17 12:25 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-09-17 12:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-09-17 12:37 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-09-17 12:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200917123757.GC3969@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox