From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/harness: Flush stdout before forking
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:06:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202009171506.535C5678@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99f67c84-4dcd-278a-e7b8-e19054818ecf@linuxfoundation.org>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:51:32AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 9/17/20 6:58 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 9/16/20 10:53 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:16 PM Michael Ellerman
> > > <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The test harness forks() a child to run each test. Both the parent and
> > > > the child print to stdout using libc functions. That can lead to
> > > > duplicated (or more) output if the libc buffers are not flushed before
> > > > forking.
> > > >
> > > > It's generally not seen when running programs directly, because stdout
> > > > will usually be line buffered when it's pointing to a terminal.
> > > >
> > > > This was noticed when running the seccomp_bpf test, eg:
> > > >
> > > > $ ./seccomp_bpf | tee test.log
> > > > $ grep -c "TAP version 13" test.log
> > > > 2
> > > >
> > > > But we only expect the TAP header to appear once.
> > > >
> > > > It can be exacerbated using stdbuf to increase the buffer size:
> > > >
> > > > $ stdbuf -o 1MB ./seccomp_bpf > test.log
> > > > $ grep -c "TAP version 13" test.log
> > > > 13
> > > >
> > > > The fix is simple, we just flush stdout & stderr before fork. Usually
> > > > stderr is unbuffered, but that can be changed, so flush it as well
> > > > just to be safe.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h | 5 +++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
> > >
> >
> > Thank you both. Applying to linux-kselftest fixes for 5.9-rc7
> >
>
> Kees,
>
> I haven't pulled this in yet. If you want to take this through seccomp
> tree for dependencies:
>
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
You can have it -- it's a global fix and more than the seccomp selftest
is likely affected. :)
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-17 4:15 [PATCH] selftests/harness: Flush stdout before forking Michael Ellerman
2020-09-17 4:53 ` Max Filippov
2020-09-17 12:58 ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-17 16:51 ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-17 22:06 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-09-18 3:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-18 14:32 ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-17 22:07 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202009171506.535C5678@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox