From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046E0C4363D for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48E723AA3 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728499AbgIVGWy (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 02:22:54 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:43268 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727939AbgIVGWy (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 02:22:54 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 17D146736F; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 08:22:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 08:22:49 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Minchan Kim , Nitin Gupta , x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: use vmap in shmem_pin_map Message-ID: <20200922062249.GA30831@lst.de> References: <20200918163724.2511-1-hch@lst.de> <20200918163724.2511-4-hch@lst.de> <20200921191157.GX32101@casper.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200921191157.GX32101@casper.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 08:11:57PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > This is awkward. I'd like it if we had a vfree() variant which called > put_page() instead of __free_pages(). I'd like it even more if we > used release_pages() instead of our own loop that called put_page(). Note that we don't need a new vfree variant, we can do this manually if we want, take a look at kernel/dma/remap.c. But I thought this code intentionally doesn't want to do that to avoid locking in the memory for the pages array. Maybe the i915 maintainers can clarify.