public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Skip duration_time in setup_system_wide
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:02:18 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922180218.GC2248446@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922175630.GB2248446@kernel.org>

Em Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:56:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:50:04AM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
> > Some metrics (such as DRAM_BW_Use) consists of uncore events and
> > duration_time. For uncore events, counter->core.system_wide is
> > true. But for duration_time, counter->core.system_wide is false
> > so target.system_wide is set to false.
> > 
> > Then 'enable_on_exec' is set in perf_event_attr of uncore event.
> > Kernel will return error when trying to open the uncore event.
> > 
> > This patch skips the duration_time in setup_system_wide then
> > target.system_wide will be set to true for the evlist of uncore
> > events + duration_time.
> > 
> > Before (tested on skylake desktop):
> > 
> >  # perf stat -M DRAM_BW_Use -- sleep 1
> >  Error:
> >  The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/).
> >  /bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.
> > 
> > After:
> > 
> >  # perf stat -M DRAM_BW_Use -- sleep 1
> > 
> >   Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> > 
> >                 169      arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/ #     0.00 DRAM_BW_Use
> >              40,427      arb/event=0x81,umask=0x1/
> >       1,000,902,197 ns   duration_time
> > 
> >         1.000902197 seconds time elapsed
> > 
> > Fixes: 648b5af3f3ae ("libperf: Move 'system_wide' from 'struct evsel' to 'struct perf_evsel'")
> 
> Humm, what makes you think that this cset was the one introducing this
> problem? It just moves evsel->system_wide to evsel->core.system_wide.

Apart from that I reproduced the problem and after applying your patch
it seems cured:

  [acme@quaco perf]$ grep 'model name' -m1 /proc/cpuinfo
  model name	: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz

Before (with -v to see details):

  [root@quaco ~]# perf stat -v -M DRAM_BW_Use -- sleep 1
  Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-8E-A
  metric expr 64 * ( arb@event\=0x81\,umask\=0x1@ + arb@event\=0x84\,umask\=0x1@ ) / 1000000 / duration_time / 1000 for DRAM_BW_Use
  found event duration_time
  found event arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/
  found event arb/event=0x81,umask=0x1/
  adding {arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/,arb/event=0x81,umask=0x1/}:W,duration_time
  Control descriptor is not initialized
  Warning:
  arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/ event is not supported by the kernel.
  Error:
  The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/).
  /bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.
  
  [root@quaco ~]#

After:

  [root@quaco ~]# perf stat -M DRAM_BW_Use -- sleep 1
  
   Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
  
               2,806      arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/ #     0.63 DRAM_BW_Use
          10,001,820      arb/event=0x81,umask=0x1/
       1,016,875,686 ns   duration_time
  
         1.016875686 seconds time elapsed
  
  [root@quaco ~]#

So I'm removing that fixes and adding this one, that I think is where
"duration_time" was being considered...

Fixes: e3ba76deef23064f ("perf tools: Force uncore events to system wide monitoring")

Also, wouldn't it be better to have the duration_time event with its
evsel->core.system_wide set to true?

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-22 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-22  1:50 [PATCH] perf stat: Skip duration_time in setup_system_wide Jin Yao
2020-09-22 17:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-22 18:02   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2020-09-23  2:05     ` Jin, Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200922180218.GC2248446@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox