From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EE1C2D0E2 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3BD21D7F for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="aOAz9t9f" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727731AbgIXMY2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:24:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38488 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727468AbgIXMY2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:24:28 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB60DC0613CE; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:24:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=h6ZjDVpARQmoVPgdF+zXfNDaRDvpx+lMRIGHPuMBPtY=; b=aOAz9t9fqjembb+394L2A1bdbS z/vtPluZC+nVb3yOaU1S+Fq6jcMR7ammr4tS1JqhyGzj63uuYsLw9Gm+g3Il2eWJKtdH7irakPNSV AyCpkbHXvIcIPg2R9o0JL4rTkaXPhdHfxJCipWE0wvTnVVZ6y1sJvk3ruEzy04oB8eCckhOsh1VKw nsasweiQEUZIp/j66KN/XMrmJfHSh6WLy9ImN8LAkH/5DDBSR1dk9OW3TwRrqTxBJXUt6PtV/sJmS XMIrli2fh1iV3Io+Ljl61Z3BG2nRYu6zzswKCqzCFLDu5OCv257xpqTZwomAknTyuD6uZVTn8MPEm YeBG2WwQ==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kLQIA-0005qN-Om; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:24:06 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 508843059DE; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:24:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ECE7E20315103; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:24:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:24:02 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Nitesh Narayan Lal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, lihong.yang@intel.com, helgaas@kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, jlelli@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org, bhelgaas@google.com, mike.marciniszyn@intel.com, dennis.dalessandro@intel.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jerinj@marvell.com, mathias.nyman@intel.com, jiri@nvidia.com, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/isolation: API to get housekeeping online CPUs Message-ID: <20200924122402.GH2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20200923181126.223766-1-nitesh@redhat.com> <20200923181126.223766-2-nitesh@redhat.com> <20200924084029.GC1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200924120956.GA19346@lenoir> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200924120956.GA19346@lenoir> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:09:57PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > +static inline unsigned int hk_num_online_cpus(void) > > > > This breaks with the established naming of that header. > > I guess we can make it housekeeping_num_online_cpus() ? That would be consistent :-)