From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14947C4346E for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C787E239E5 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:51:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601203904; bh=LuJwxbBeF9XD3wW8JpjoD0UmHeltVCkga+Xc9SCJVN8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=MBrnFEl5Bx9sxOv4PGbZF4v/bsp/BwWTnoqd+rwsD/DJqMQLsutb++yh2BUaKuGhd L2YftFXAhJgMEx0Vn0JV640nz2Lj3BAmfUijIMKPkg3/vrs29l9nz6v7PBcl39VtPx lIII1197tEFK98Iz4kb9ai1Hk747q3Y/x89NUe5c= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726335AbgI0Kvn (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 06:51:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34102 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726196AbgI0Kvn (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 06:51:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC6F323977; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:51:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601203902; bh=LuJwxbBeF9XD3wW8JpjoD0UmHeltVCkga+Xc9SCJVN8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FfLtD/nIZI4nllpScwwOIsGVd73EezR6ana6m7et8MoKJQOU0N8wZQb7P3gwnYHWx c5Tg51Mq/azSs3ofhyAXhKTYuiRveWqfLPsqESpKfS0OlThwtiMFNDTL3nIUQeoyrU nsODyJtNV9b+yE0aeBXhIWpCXF70xlq/7vChN9sU= Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:51:52 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: shuo.a.liu@intel.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Sean Christopherson , Yu Wang , Reinette Chatre , Yakui Zhao , Dave Hansen , Dan Williams , Fengwei Yin , Zhi Wang , Zhenyu Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/17] x86/acrn: Introduce hypercall interfaces Message-ID: <20200927105152.GG88650@kroah.com> References: <20200922114311.38804-1-shuo.a.liu@intel.com> <20200922114311.38804-5-shuo.a.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200922114311.38804-5-shuo.a.liu@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 07:42:58PM +0800, shuo.a.liu@intel.com wrote: > From: Shuo Liu > > The Service VM communicates with the hypervisor via conventional > hypercalls. VMCALL instruction is used to make the hypercalls. > > ACRN hypercall ABI: > * Hypercall number is in R8 register. > * Up to 2 parameters are in RDI and RSI registers. > * Return value is in RAX register. > > Introduce the ACRN hypercall interfaces. Because GCC doesn't support R8 > register as direct register constraints, here are two ways to use R8 in > extended asm: > 1) use explicit register variable as input > 2) use supported constraint as input with a explicit MOV to R8 in > beginning of asm > > The number of instructions of above two ways are same. > Asm code from 1) > 38: 41 b8 00 00 00 80 mov $0x80000000,%r8d > 3e: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi > 41: 0f 01 c1 vmcall > Here, writes to the lower dword (%r8d) clear the upper dword of %r8 when > the CPU is in 64-bit mode. > > Asm code from 2) > 38: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi > 3b: 49 b8 00 00 00 80 00 movabs $0x80000000,%r8 > 42: 00 00 00 > 45: 0f 01 c1 vmcall > > Choose 1) for code simplicity and a little bit of code size > optimization. > > Originally-by: Yakui Zhao > Signed-off-by: Shuo Liu > Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre > Cc: Dave Hansen > Cc: Sean Christopherson > Cc: Dan Williams > Cc: Fengwei Yin > Cc: Zhi Wang > Cc: Zhenyu Wang > Cc: Yu Wang > Cc: Reinette Chatre > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/acrn.h | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acrn.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acrn.h > index a2d4aea3a80d..23a93b87edeb 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acrn.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acrn.h > @@ -14,4 +14,61 @@ void acrn_setup_intr_handler(void (*handler)(void)); > void acrn_remove_intr_handler(void); > bool acrn_is_privileged_vm(void); > > +/* > + * Hypercalls for ACRN > + * > + * - VMCALL instruction is used to implement ACRN hypercalls. > + * - ACRN hypercall ABI: > + * - Hypercall number is passed in R8 register. > + * - Up to 2 arguments are passed in RDI, RSI. > + * - Return value will be placed in RAX. > + */ > +static inline long acrn_hypercall0(unsigned long hcall_id) > +{ > + register long r8 asm("r8"); > + long result; > + > + /* Nothing can come between the r8 assignment and the asm: */ > + r8 = hcall_id; > + asm volatile("vmcall\n\t" > + : "=a" (result) > + : "r" (r8) > + : ); What keeps an interrupt from happening between the r8 assignment and the asm: ? Is this something that most hypercalls need to handle? I don't see other ones needing this type of thing, is it just because of how these are defined? confused, greg k-h