Re: [PATCH 3/3] platform/x86: Intel PMT Crashlog capability driver

Hans de Goede
2020-09-21T14:02:20Z

Hi,

On 9/21/20 3:57 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 6:16 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 9/17/20 11:35 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 5:12 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 9/15/20 12:35 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:07 AM Alexander Duyck
>>>>> <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 6:42 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/11/20 9:45 PM, David E. Box wrote:
>>>>>>>> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add support for the Intel Platform Monitoring Technology crashlog
>>>>>>>> interface. This interface provides a few sysfs values to allow for
>>>>>>>> controlling the crashlog telemetry interface as well as a character driver
>>>>>>>> to allow for mapping the crashlog memory region so that it can be accessed
>>>>>>>> after a crashlog has been recorded.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This driver is meant to only support the server version of the crashlog
>>>>>>>> which is identified as crash_type 1 with a version of zero. Currently no
>>>>>>>> other types are supported.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-pmt_crashlog | 66 ++
>>>>>>>> drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 10 +
>>>>>>>> drivers/platform/x86/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>>>> drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmt_crashlog.c | 588 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> 4 files changed, 665 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-pmt_crashlog
>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmt_crashlog.c
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-pmt_crashlog b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-pmt_crashlog
>>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>>> index 000000000000..40fb4ff437a6
>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-pmt_crashlog
>>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
>>>>>>>> +What: /sys/class/pmt_crashlog/
>>>>>>>> +Date: September 2020
>>>>>>>> +KernelVersion: 5.10
>>>>>>>> +Contact: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> +Description:
>>>>>>>> + The pmt_crashlog/ class directory contains information
>>>>>>>> + for devices that expose crashlog capabilities using the Intel
>>>>>>>> + Platform Monitoring Technology (PTM).
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +What: /sys/class/pmt_crashlog/crashlogX
>>>>>>>> +Date: September 2020
>>>>>>>> +KernelVersion: 5.10
>>>>>>>> +Contact: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> +Description:
>>>>>>>> + The crashlogX directory contains files for configuring an
>>>>>>>> + instance of a PMT crashlog device that can perform crash data
>>>>>>>> + recoring. Each crashlogX device has an associated
>>>>>>>> + /dev/crashlogX device node. This node can be opened and mapped
>>>>>>>> + to access the resulting crashlog data. The register layout for
>>>>>>>> + the log can be determined from an XML file of specified guid
>>>>>>>> + for the parent device.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +What: /sys/class/pmt_crashlog/crashlogX/guid
>>>>>>>> +Date: September 2020
>>>>>>>> +KernelVersion: 5.10
>>>>>>>> +Contact: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> +Description:
>>>>>>>> + (RO) The guid for this crashlog device. The guid identifies the
>>>>>>>> + version of the XML file for the parent device that should be
>>>>>>>> + used to determine the register layout.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +What: /sys/class/pmt_crashlog/crashlogX/size
>>>>>>>> +Date: September 2020
>>>>>>>> +KernelVersion: 5.10
>>>>>>>> +Contact: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> +Description:
>>>>>>>> + (RO) The length of the result buffer in bytes that corresponds
>>>>>>>> + to the mapping size for the /dev/crashlogX device node.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +What: /sys/class/pmt_crashlog/crashlogX/offset
>>>>>>>> +Date: September 2020
>>>>>>>> +KernelVersion: 5.10
>>>>>>>> +Contact: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> +Description:
>>>>>>>> + (RO) The offset of the buffer in bytes that corresponds
>>>>>>>> + to the mapping for the /dev/crashlogX device node.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +What: /sys/class/pmt_crashlog/crashlogX/enable
>>>>>>>> +Date: September 2020
>>>>>>>> +KernelVersion: 5.10
>>>>>>>> +Contact: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> +Description:
>>>>>>>> + (RW) Boolean value controlling if the crashlog functionality
>>>>>>>> + is enabled for the /dev/crashlogX device node.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +What: /sys/class/pmt_crashlog/crashlogX/trigger
>>>>>>>> +Date: September 2020
>>>>>>>> +KernelVersion: 5.10
>>>>>>>> +Contact: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> +Description:
>>>>>>>> + (RW) Boolean value controlling the triggering of the
>>>>>>>> + /dev/crashlogX device node. When read it provides data on if
>>>>>>>> + the crashlog has been triggered. When written to it can be
>>>>>>>> + used to either clear the current trigger by writing false, or
>>>>>>>> + to trigger a new event if the trigger is not currently set.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both the pmt_crashlog and the attributes suggest that this is highly
>>>>>>> Intel PMT specific. /sys/class/foo interfaces are generally speaking
>>>>>>> meant to be generic interfaces.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If this was defining a generic, vendor and implementation agnostic interface for
>>>>>>> configuring / accessing crashlogs, then using a class would be fine, but that
>>>>>>> is not the case, so I believe that this should not implement / register a class.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since the devices are instantiated through MFD there already is a
>>>>>>> static sysfs-path which can be used to find the device in sysfs:
>>>>>>> /sys/bus/platform/device/pmt_crashlog
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you can register the sysfs attributes directly under the platform_device
>>>>>>> and then userspace can easily find them, so there really is no need to
>>>>>>> use a class here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see. So we change the root directory from "/sys/class/pmt_crashlog/"
>>>>>> to "/sys/bus/platform/device/pmt_crashlog" while retaining the same
>>>>>> functionality. That should be workable.
>>>>>
>>>>> So one issue as I see it is that if we were to change this then we
>>>>> probably need to to change the telemetry functionality that was
>>>>> recently accepted
>>>>> (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200819180255.11770-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com/)
>>
>> You say that this has been accepted, by I don't see any intel_pmt.c
>> file here yet: ?
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/mfd/
>
> Here is a link to the thread on the first patch set. The last notes I
> saw were that it was going to be applied but it looks like that never
> happened.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200819180255.11770-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com/
>
>>>>> as well. The general idea with using the /sys/class/pmt_crashlog/
>>>>> approach was to keep things consistent with how the pmt_telemetry was
>>>>> being accessed. So if we change this then we end up with very
>>>>> different interfaces for the two very similar pieces of functionality.
>>>>> So ideally we would want to change both telemetry and crashlog to
>>>>> function the same way.
>>>>
>>>> I agree that the telemetry interface should be changed in a similar way.
>>>>
>>>> Luckily it seems that this is not in Linus' tree yet and I'm also not
>>>> seeing it in next yet, e.g. :
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmt_telemetry.c
>>>> does not exist.
>>>>
>>>> So we seem to still have time to also get the telemetry driver userspace API
>>>> fixed too.
>>>>
>>>> I see that Andy gave his Reviewed-by for the intel_pmt_telemetry.c code.
>>>>
>>>> Andy, I have some concerns about the userspace API choices made here,
>>>> see my earlier review of this patch. Do you agree with my suggestions,
>>>> or do you think it would be ok to move forward with the telemetry and
>>>> now also the crashlog API each registering their own private class
>>>> under /sys/class ?
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK classes are supposed to be generic and not driver-private, so
>>>> that seems wrong to me. Also PMC is Intel specific and vendor specific
>>>> stuff really does not belong under /sys/class AFAIK ?
>>>>
>>>>> Do you have any good examples of anything that has done something
>>>>> similar? From what I can tell it looks like we need to clean up the
>>>>> naming to drop the ".%d.auto" for the bus directory names
>>>>
>>>> Assuming there will only be one of each platform-device, then you
>>>> can just replace the PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO param to devm_mfd_add_devices()
>>>> with PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE and the .%d.auto will go away.
>>>
>>> We will have multiples of each platform device. So for example we can
>>> have multiple OOBMSM in each system and each OOBMSM may have multiple
>>> telemetry regions and maybe one crashlog.
>>
>> What is a OOBMSM ? Please don't make the person reviewing your patches
>> do detective work. Only use acronyms if they are something of which
>> you could reasonably expect any mailinglist reader to know what
>> they are.
>
> OOBMSM is an acronym for the Out-of-Band Management Services Module.
> It is a PCIe function exposed by a device or CPU to provide in-band
> telemetry.
>
>> So looking at:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200819180255.11770-3-david.e.box@linux.intel.com/
>>
>> What you are saying (I guess) is that both the pmt_pci_probe()
>> function may run multiple times; and that for a single pmt_pci_probe()
>> call, pmt_add_dev() may hit the DVSEC_INTEL_ID_TELEMETRY case more then
>> once?
>>
>> If I understand either one correct, then indeed we need PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO.
>>
>> Which I guess makes using a class for enumeration somewhat sensible.
>
> Correct. In our case there will be multiple instances of each device
> being potentially allocated.
>
>> But I really do not think we need 2 separate classes, one for
>> pmt_telemetry and one for pmt_crashlog. Also since this is rather
>> Intel specific lets at least make that clear in the name.
>>
>> So how about intel_pmt as class and then register both the telemetry
>> and the crashlog devs there? (the type can easily be deferred from
>> the name part before the .%d.auto suffix) ?
>
> Agreed. So we would set it up as an intel_pmt and then in the case of
> crashlog we would be adding the binary sysfs for the memory access, a
> trigger control, and the enable control. For the telemetry we would
> just be adding the binary sysfs for the telemetry access. Do I have
> all of that correct?

Yes sounds good.

Regards,

Hans