From: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched/rt.c remove unnecessary parameter in pick_next_rt_entity
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:56:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200929165640.GA28986@rlk> (raw)
struct rq is not necessary for pick_next_rt_entity(),
we can get next sched_rt_entity just from struct rt_rq.
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index f215eea6a966..113965e1952c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1593,11 +1593,9 @@ static inline void set_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool f
rt_queue_push_tasks(rq);
}
-static struct sched_rt_entity *pick_next_rt_entity(struct rq *rq,
- struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
+static struct sched_rt_entity *pick_next_rt_entity(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
- struct sched_rt_entity *next = NULL;
struct list_head *queue;
int idx;
@@ -1605,9 +1603,8 @@ static struct sched_rt_entity *pick_next_rt_entity(struct rq *rq,
BUG_ON(idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO);
queue = array->queue + idx;
- next = list_entry(queue->next, struct sched_rt_entity, run_list);
- return next;
+ return list_entry(queue->next, struct sched_rt_entity, run_list);
}
static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
@@ -1616,7 +1613,7 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = &rq->rt;
do {
- rt_se = pick_next_rt_entity(rq, rt_rq);
+ rt_se = pick_next_rt_entity(rt_rq);
BUG_ON(!rt_se);
rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
} while (rt_rq);
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-09-29 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 16:56 Hui Su [this message]
2020-09-30 0:29 ` [PATCH] sched/rt.c remove unnecessary parameter in pick_next_rt_entity Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200929165640.GA28986@rlk \
--to=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox