From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90358C2D0A8 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200BC2075F for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="bLBgSqlZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725823AbgI3FFG (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 01:05:06 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:41782 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725497AbgI3FFF (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 01:05:05 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f092a003ee64aac7a8dc174.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f09:2a00:3ee6:4aac:7a8d:c174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 36A3D1EC03D5; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 07:05:04 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1601442304; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=n2nkxu4xTZZhZzy2McG9Zfzz9yulljqwC+oUwVYbXuw=; b=bLBgSqlZAZjg/6IZuhzkE8BHpsAH5mJ25Fl0wXPymz3R8Iiowss8xSVi+BiZ9ck57j+EGU IFHvRlGQiaArpROj2Q5VR4U27AlusQLRhCDHJLtKYLefaO5/YSzLcB4Y7pJ6X5vUW/QYMl 0+0rTy9poUtzo/YQjbVC4Aivf9qvARQ= Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 07:04:55 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Dan Williams Cc: Ingo Molnar , Tony Luck , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , stable , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Erwin Tsaur , Michael Ellerman , Mikulas Patocka , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , 0day robot , linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] Renovate memcpy_mcsafe with copy_mc_to_{user, kernel} Message-ID: <20200930050455.GA6810@zn.tnic> References: <160087928642.3520.17063139768910633998.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:32:07PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > Given that Linus was the primary source of review feedback on these > patches and a version of them have been soaking in -next with only a > minor conflict report with vfs.git for the entirety of the v5.9-rc > cycle (left there inadvertently while I was on leave), any concerns > with me sending this to Linus directly during the merge window? What's wrong with them going through tip? But before that pls have a look at this question I have here: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200929102512.GB21110@zn.tnic Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette