From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF9AC4727E for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAA12071E for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728676AbgI3Kdl (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:33:41 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59598 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725779AbgI3Kdk (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:33:40 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B94EAF27; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:33:36 +0200 From: Oscar Salvador To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Daniel Jordan , Zi Yan , John Hubbard , Mike Kravetz , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC V2] mm/vmstat: Add events for HugeTLB migration Message-ID: <20200930103331.GA30472@linux> References: <1601445649-22163-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <20200930074639.GA26786@linux> <5f8a390c-8280-9b04-bf4a-3454d5984bf1@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5f8a390c-8280-9b04-bf4a-3454d5984bf1@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 03:32:10PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > Right, it would be simple. But as Mike had mentioned before PageHuge() > check is more expensive than PageTransHuge(). This proposal just tries > not to call PageHuge() unless the page first clears PageTransHuge(), > saving some potential CPU cycles on normal pages. Ah, I remember now. I missed that, sorry. -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3