From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: minyard@acm.org
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:tty:pty: Fix a race causing data loss on close
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 14:01:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201002120133.GB3339665@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201002021630.4892-1-minyard@acm.org>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:16:30PM -0500, minyard@acm.org wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
>
> If you write to a pty master an immediately close the pty master, the
> receiver might get a chunk of data dropped, but then receive some later
> data. That's obviously something rather unexpected for a user. It
> certainly confused my test program.
>
> It turns out that tty_vhangup() gets called from pty_close(), and that
> causes the data on the slave side to be flushed, but due to races more
> data can be copied into the slave side's buffer after that. Consider
> the following sequence:
>
> thread1 thread2 thread3
> write data into buffer,
> n_tty buffer is filled
> pty_close()
> tty_vhangup()
> tty_ldisc_hangup()
> n_tty_flush_buffer()
> reset_buffer_flags()
> n_tty_read()
> up_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
> down_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
> clear n_tty buffer contents
> up_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
> tty_buffer_flush_work()
> schedules work calling
> flush_to_ldisc()
> flush_to_ldisc()
> receive_buf()
> tty_port_default_receive_buf()
> tty_ldisc_receive_buf()
> tty_ldisc_receive_buf()
> n_tty_receive_buf2()
> n_tty_receive_buf_common()
> down_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
> __receive_buf()
> copies data into n_tty buffer
> up_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
> down_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
> copy buffer data to user
Your text got line-wrapped here for this explaination and it doesn't
make much sense :(
Can you resend this?
> This change checks to see if the tty is being hung up before copying
> anything in n_tty_receive_buf_common(). It has to be done after the
> tty->termios_rwsem semaphore is claimed, for reasons that should be
> apparent from the sequence above.
That kind of makes sense, but it's tricky, if you resend with the above
fixed it might be more obvious...
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-02 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-02 2:16 [PATCH] drivers:tty:pty: Fix a race causing data loss on close minyard
2020-10-02 12:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201002120133.GB3339665@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox