Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the bpf tree

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 959 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:07:15 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   1245008122d7 ("libbpf: Fix native endian assumption when parsing BTF")
> 
> from the bpf tree and commit:
> 
>   3289959b97ca ("libbpf: Support BTF loading and raw data output in both endianness")
> 
> from the bpf-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I used the latter version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the net-next and net trees.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]