From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1318C41604 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 06:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C7221548 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 06:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="mXkwBwV3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726761AbgJFG4W (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2020 02:56:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50432 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725962AbgJFG4V (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2020 02:56:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com (mail-wm1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::343]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67CF7C061755 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 23:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id v12so1835929wmh.3 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 23:56:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=uefgcZJEjxyEQ9EMRE9mQWtY5FP1/cOBvuhrVucWaL4=; b=mXkwBwV3uHgEOxFz+BrpkbePSh2uIiVsOL4Q8BYDAJDypvyxJYM0atdBu9izyBiklN JUT7Rs3FZZcA7EGJwKM5eeigcUBVvcDfeZm83LFbXnscy1H1lahoLDUs2XAHwSXWered DoiTT0h2TqAf+eoQCa+OKq1yKWTMadlruJk2Jaq03oF84s+8Isc4+roffFBG83sO+pPJ QpcK3Ic1k3+Ao2UnCTjcI5+Xsv99zs8kNZPGGF7AhC+2etryShDW/guLwkZ7bHE/VSa4 bxTXQmucpLNCD3efMbFkW6dDT90QxhHowDxNVj2MVVRdHZvtBaYzDalinrAp5ynsnWs1 U3kQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=uefgcZJEjxyEQ9EMRE9mQWtY5FP1/cOBvuhrVucWaL4=; b=G3qj+UqfR/FOdg//XMRFaKInR6zxdl/sMy/lniYqmqfQS6QAcs96Q/P0Gy/JdzzS5f eO3dMrYl2F9S+bLM28hgva5+8ckj5agxbNV6IsYtyYmly27K9Elzojq+L8mfY6aNgtCO xzize/8PBnS9OA9pj5111naWQ6pBanpmy7Zi84VOtZGPPjGfJPkaMr9PwTPzEiJOAvc3 ztRDT49oWnU1MQqGZUIZ9idQnln3F7d8zQU+9cR8sQinbCJLkatG2x/7YL+SbE19iIjW TfQt4ptiisTEqmeATJCWuQ4h6VVIyy7w/pJra4VMWsb89a0Eo8NOByiCJiIKXmhBbHNf Cceg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310ungzftofQq/GXoP4IqPfgwEGz6sTlgK3H2AGDMlBnEzbdwub LMszn384xCzlex00wBVIAphuqQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXGqcOK5nEDYkkUxOnDx8BbUTICgzVOqRZG+MR8mEOAOKX5hhn6oiAkfCBUvZAL7QZuAzfFQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb04:: with SMTP id u4mr3091764wmj.130.1601967379940; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 23:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.236]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b8sm2545643wmb.4.2020.10.05.23.56.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Oct 2020 23:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 07:56:17 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Kalle Valo Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Luciano Coelho Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/29] [Set 1,2,3] Rid W=1 warnings in Wireless Message-ID: <20201006065617.GX6148@dell> References: <20200910065431.657636-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20201002090353.GS6148@dell> <87362rdhv2.fsf@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87362rdhv2.fsf@codeaurora.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, Kalle Valo wrote: > Lee Jones writes: > > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2020, Lee Jones wrote: > > > >> This is a rebased/re-worked set of patches which have been > >> previously posted to the mailing list(s). > >> > >> This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > >> kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > >> niggly little warnings. > >> > >> There are quite a few W=1 warnings in the Wireless. My plan > >> is to work through all of them over the next few weeks. > >> Hopefully it won't be too long before drivers/net/wireless > >> builds clean with W=1 enabled. > >> > >> Lee Jones (29): > >> iwlwifi: dvm: Demote non-compliant kernel-doc headers > >> iwlwifi: rs: Demote non-compliant kernel-doc headers > >> iwlwifi: dvm: tx: Demote non-compliant kernel-doc headers > >> iwlwifi: dvm: lib: Demote non-compliant kernel-doc headers > >> iwlwifi: calib: Demote seemingly unintentional kerneldoc header > >> wil6210: Fix a couple of formatting issues in 'wil6210_debugfs_init' > >> iwlwifi: dvm: sta: Demote a bunch of nonconformant kernel-doc headers > >> iwlwifi: mvm: ops: Remove unused static struct 'iwl_mvm_debug_names' > >> iwlwifi: dvm: Demote a couple of nonconformant kernel-doc headers > >> iwlwifi: mvm: utils: Fix some doc-rot > >> iwlwifi: dvm: scan: Demote a few nonconformant kernel-doc headers > >> iwlwifi: dvm: rxon: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc headers > >> iwlwifi: mvm: tx: Demote misuse of kernel-doc headers > >> iwlwifi: dvm: devices: Fix function documentation formatting issues > >> iwlwifi: iwl-drv: Provide descriptions debugfs dentries > >> wil6210: wmi: Fix formatting and demote non-conforming function > >> headers > >> wil6210: interrupt: Demote comment header which is clearly not > >> kernel-doc > >> wil6210: txrx: Demote obvious abuse of kernel-doc > >> wil6210: txrx_edma: Demote comments which are clearly not kernel-doc > >> wil6210: pmc: Demote a few nonconformant kernel-doc function headers > >> wil6210: wil_platform: Demote kernel-doc header to standard comment > >> block > >> wil6210: wmi: Correct misnamed function parameter 'ptr_' > >> ath6kl: wmi: Remove unused variable 'rate' > >> ath9k: ar9002_initvals: Remove unused array > >> 'ar9280PciePhy_clkreq_off_L1_9280' > >> ath9k: ar9001_initvals: Remove unused array 'ar5416Bank6_9100' > >> ath9k: ar5008_initvals: Remove unused table entirely > >> ath9k: ar5008_initvals: Move ar5416Bank{0,1,2,3,7} to where they are > >> used > >> brcmsmac: phytbl_lcn: Remove unused array 'dot11lcn_gain_tbl_rev1' > >> brcmsmac: phy_lcn: Remove unused variable > >> 'lcnphy_rx_iqcomp_table_rev0' > > > > What's happening with all of these iwlwifi patches? > > > > Looks like they are still not applied. > > Luca (CCed) takes iwlwifi patches to his iwlwifi tree. Thanks Kalle. Luca, Do you know why these patches have not been applied yet? Do you plan on applying them this week? -rc1 is not due for release for nearly 3 weeks now that Linus tagged an -rc8. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog