From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=LQxz=DO=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0058BC4363D
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed,  7 Oct 2020 13:43:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA222087D
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed,  7 Oct 2020 13:43:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728512AbgJGNn1 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:43:27 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:37400 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1728441AbgJGNn1 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:43:27 -0400
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
        id 363E76736F; Wed,  7 Oct 2020 15:43:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:43:23 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc:     Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] samples: configfs: order includes alphabetically
Message-ID: <20201007134323.GA764@lst.de>
References: <20200924124526.17365-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20200924124526.17365-3-brgl@bgdev.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200924124526.17365-3-brgl@bgdev.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:45:16PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> 
> The preferred coding style is to order all includes alphabetically for
> improved readability. There's no need for the configfs header to come
> last.

Is it?  People seem to have all kinds of weird opinions, but I don't
think any ordering really makes sense.  What does make sense it dropping
the pointless empty line, so I've folded that into the next patch.