Re: [PATCH] misc: Kconfig: add a new dependency for HISI_HIKEY_USB

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 07:18:02PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 07:09:54AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > As warned by Randy:
> > 
> > 	on x86_64:
> > 	CONFIG_USB_ROLE_SWITCH=m
> > 	and HISI_HIKEY_USB=y.
> > 
> > 	ld: drivers/misc/hisi_hikey_usb.o: in function `hisi_hikey_usb_remove':
> > 	hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0x61): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_unregister'
> > 	ld: hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0xa4): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_put'
> > 	ld: drivers/misc/hisi_hikey_usb.o: in function `hub_usb_role_switch_set':
> > 	hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0xd3): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_get_drvdata'
> > 	ld: drivers/misc/hisi_hikey_usb.o: in function `relay_set_role_switch':
> > 	hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0x54d): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_set_role'
> > 	ld: drivers/misc/hisi_hikey_usb.o: in function `hisi_hikey_usb_probe':
> > 	hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0x8a5): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_get'
> > 	ld: hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0xa08): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_register'
> > 	ld: hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0xa6e): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_put'
> > 
> > Make it dependent on CONFIG_USB_ROLE_SWITCH.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/misc/Kconfig | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > index e19e1dcceb41..7cee2b72c09e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@ config PVPANIC
> >  config HISI_HIKEY_USB
> >  	tristate "USB GPIO Hub on HiSilicon Hikey 960/970 Platform"
> >  	depends on (OF && GPIOLIB) || COMPILE_TEST
> > +	depends on CONFIG_USB_ROLE_SWITCH
> 
> Shouldn't this be
> 
> depends on USB_ROLE_SWITCH
> 
> ? Now it will never be selectable.

{sigh}

Yes, that is correct.

Mauro, can you send a fix-up patch for this, as your original is now in
my tree.

thanks,

greg k-h