linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch 1/2] nohz: only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 16:11:30 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201008191446.007280351@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20201008191129.152030255@redhat.com

When adding a tick dependency to a task, its necessary to
wakeup the CPU where the task resides to reevaluate tick
dependencies on that CPU.

However the current code wakes up all nohz_full CPUs, which 
is unnecessary.

Switch to waking up a single CPU, by using ordering of writes
to task->cpu and task->tick_dep_mask.

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu)
 	irq_work_queue_on(&per_cpu(nohz_full_kick_work, cpu), cpu);
 }
 
+static void tick_nohz_kick_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	int cpu = task_cpu(tsk);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the task concurrently migrates to another cpu,
+	 * we guarantee it sees the new tick dependency upon
+	 * schedule.
+	 *
+	 *
+	 * set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
+	 *   STORE p->cpu = @cpu
+	 * __schedule() (switch to task 'p')
+	 *   LOCK rq->lock
+	 *   smp_mb__after_spin_lock()          STORE p->tick_dep_mask
+	 *   tick_nohz_task_switch()            smp_mb() (atomic_fetch_or())
+	 *      LOAD p->tick_dep_mask           LOAD p->cpu
+	 */
+
+	preempt_disable();
+	if (cpu_online(cpu))
+		tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(cpu);
+	preempt_enable();
+}
+
 /*
  * Kick all full dynticks CPUs in order to force these to re-evaluate
  * their dependency on the tick and restart it if necessary.
@@ -356,19 +381,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_dep_clear_cp
  */
 void tick_nohz_dep_set_task(struct task_struct *tsk, enum tick_dep_bits bit)
 {
-	if (!atomic_fetch_or(BIT(bit), &tsk->tick_dep_mask)) {
-		if (tsk == current) {
-			preempt_disable();
-			tick_nohz_full_kick();
-			preempt_enable();
-		} else {
-			/*
-			 * Some future tick_nohz_full_kick_task()
-			 * should optimize this.
-			 */
-			tick_nohz_full_kick_all();
-		}
-	}
+	if (!atomic_fetch_or(BIT(bit), &tsk->tick_dep_mask))
+		tick_nohz_kick_task(tsk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_dep_set_task);
 



  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-08 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-08 19:11 [patch 0/2] nohz_full: only wakeup target CPUs when notifying new tick dependency (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-08 19:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2020-10-08 19:11 ` [patch 2/2] nohz: change signal tick dependency to wakeup CPUs of member tasks Marcelo Tosatti
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-07 18:01 [patch 0/2] nohz_full: only wakeup target CPUs when notifying new tick dependency (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-07 18:01 ` [patch 1/2] nohz: only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-08 12:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-08 17:54     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-08 19:54       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-13 17:13         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-14  8:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-14 23:40             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-15 10:12               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-26 14:42                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-20 18:52               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-10-22 12:53                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-08 14:59   ` Peter Xu
2020-10-08 15:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-08 19:16       ` Peter Xu
2020-10-08 19:48       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-08 17:43     ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201008191446.007280351@redhat.com \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).