From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: "Alasdair Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
"Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"Deven Bowers" <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Jaskaran Khurana" <jaskarankhurana@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Milan Broz" <gmazyland@gmail.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dm verity: Add support for signature verification with 2nd keyring
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 02:55:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201012235502.GA36149@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bda2ffd7-3b7c-33a4-667f-a3435e112fc1@digikod.net>
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:50:03AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What do you think about this patch?
>
> Regards,
> Mickaël
>
> On 02/10/2020 09:18, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> >
> > Add a new DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG_SECONDARY_KEYRING configuration
> > to enable dm-verity signatures to be verified against the secondary
> > trusted keyring. This allows certificate updates without kernel update
> > and reboot, aligning with module and kernel (kexec) signature
> > verifications.
I'd prefer a bit more verbose phrasing, not least because I have never
really even peeked at dm-verity, but it is also a good practice.
You have the middle part of the story missing - explaining the semantics
of how the feature leads to the aimed solution.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-12 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-02 7:18 [PATCH v1] dm verity: Add support for signature verification with 2nd keyring Mickaël Salaün
2020-10-09 9:50 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-10-12 23:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-10-13 8:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201012235502.GA36149@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=jaskarankhurana@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mic@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox