linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@gmail.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 04/12] tracing: Fix some typos in comments
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:36:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201014173728.633472308@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20201014173647.955053902@goodmis.org

From: Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@gmail.com>

s/wihin/within/
s/retrieven/retrieved/
s/suppport/support/
s/wil/will/
s/accidently/accidentally/
s/if the if the/if the/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201010140924.3809-1-hqjagain@gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 ++--
 kernel/trace/trace.h | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 0806fa9f2815..63c97012ed39 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -9465,7 +9465,7 @@ __init static int tracer_alloc_buffers(void)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Make sure we don't accidently add more trace options
+	 * Make sure we don't accidentally add more trace options
 	 * than we have bits for.
 	 */
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TRACE_ITER_LAST_BIT > TRACE_FLAGS_MAX_SIZE);
@@ -9494,7 +9494,7 @@ __init static int tracer_alloc_buffers(void)
 
 	/*
 	 * The prepare callbacks allocates some memory for the ring buffer. We
-	 * don't free the buffer if the if the CPU goes down. If we were to free
+	 * don't free the buffer if the CPU goes down. If we were to free
 	 * the buffer, then the user would lose any trace that was in the
 	 * buffer. The memory will be removed once the "instance" is removed.
 	 */
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index 5b0e797cacdd..f777bb68e660 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ typedef bool (*cond_update_fn_t)(struct trace_array *tr, void *cond_data);
  * tracing_snapshot_cond(tr, cond_data), the cond_data passed in is
  * passed in turn to the cond_snapshot.update() function.  That data
  * can be compared by the update() implementation with the cond_data
- * contained wihin the struct cond_snapshot instance associated with
+ * contained within the struct cond_snapshot instance associated with
  * the trace_array.  Because the tr->max_lock is held throughout the
  * update() call, the update() function can directly retrieve the
  * cond_snapshot and cond_data associated with the per-instance
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ typedef bool (*cond_update_fn_t)(struct trace_array *tr, void *cond_data);
  *	take the snapshot, by returning 'true' if so, 'false' if no
  *	snapshot should be taken.  Because the max_lock is held for
  *	the duration of update(), the implementation is safe to
- *	directly retrieven and save any implementation data it needs
+ *	directly retrieved and save any implementation data it needs
  *	to in association with the snapshot.
  */
 struct cond_snapshot {
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ struct tracer {
  *   The function callback, which can use the FTRACE bits to
  *    check for recursion.
  *
- * Now if the arch does not suppport a feature, and it calls
+ * Now if the arch does not support a feature, and it calls
  * the global list function which calls the ftrace callback
  * all three of these steps will do a recursion protection.
  * There's no reason to do one if the previous caller already
@@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ __trace_event_discard_commit(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
 /*
  * Helper function for event_trigger_unlock_commit{_regs}().
  * If there are event triggers attached to this event that requires
- * filtering against its fields, then they wil be called as the
+ * filtering against its fields, then they will be called as the
  * entry already holds the field information of the current event.
  *
  * It also checks if the event should be discarded or not.
-- 
2.28.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-14 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-14 17:36 [for-next][PATCH 00/12] tracing: Last minute updates before sending to Linus Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 01/12] tracing: Check return value of __create_val_fields() before using its result Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 02/12] tracing: Fix race in trace_open and buffer resize call Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 03/12] tracing/boot: Add ftrace.instance.*.alloc_snapshot option Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 05/12] tracing: Dont show dynamic string internals in synthetic event description Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 06/12] tracing: Move is_good_name() from trace_probe.h to trace.h Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 07/12] tracing: Check that the synthetic event and field names are legal Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 08/12] tracing: Add synthetic event error logging Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 09/12] selftests/ftrace: Change synthetic event name for inter-event-combined test Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 10/12] tracing: Handle synthetic event array field type checking correctly Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 11/12] selftests/ftrace: Add test case for synthetic event syntax errors Steven Rostedt
2020-10-14 17:36 ` [for-next][PATCH 12/12] tracing: support "bool" type in synthetic trace events Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201014173728.633472308@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hqjagain@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).