Re: [PATCH v2] lib: kunit: add list_sort test conversion to KUnit

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 02:59:05PM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:46:16PM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote:
> > > This adds the conversion of the runtime tests of test_list_sort,
> > > from `lib/test_list_sort.c` to KUnit tests.
> >
> > >  rename lib/{test_list_sort.c => list_sort_kunit.c} (62%)
> >
> > One more thing. The documentation [1] doesn't specify any name conventions.
> > So, please leave file name untouched.
> >
> > [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/index.html
> 
> This convention hasn't yet entered the Torvaldos tree, but it is in
> the Shuah tree: [1]
> 
> +Test File and Module Names
> +==========================
> +
> +KUnit tests can often be compiled as a module. These modules should be named
> +after the test suite, followed by ``_test``. If this is likely to conflict with
> +non-KUnit tests, the suffix ``_kunit`` can also be used.
> +
> +The easiest way of achieving this is to name the file containing the test suite
> +``<suite>_test.c`` (or, as above, ``<suite>_kunit.c``). This file should be
> +placed next to the code under test.
> +
> +If the suite name contains some or all of the name of the test's parent
> +directory, it may make sense to modify the source filename to reduce
> redundancy.
> +For example, a ``foo_firmware`` suite could be in the ``foo/firmware_test.c``
> +file.
> 
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit&id=2a41fc52c21b6ece49921716bd289bfebaadcc04

I see.

Can the rest of documentation be consistent with this? It seems half-baked,
since examples show something different.

(Entire documentation if full of example-test.c)


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko