From: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi-cpufreq: Honor _PSD table setting in CPU frequency control
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:08:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201016160824.GA63297@weilap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0g3fzSHOjKhaF0Nof=81MkX_GF7A6NL8-=5gQgQVtkY+g@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/16 04:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:44 PM Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > acpi-cpufreq has a old quirk that overrides the _PSD table supplied by
> > BIOS on AMD CPUs. However the _PSD table of new AMD CPUs (Family 19h+)
> > now accurately reports the P-state dependency of CPU cores. Hence this
> > quirk needs to be fixed in order to support new CPUs' frequency control.
> >
> > Fixes: acd316248205 ("acpi-cpufreq: Add quirk to disable _PSD usage on all AMD CPUs")
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > index e4ff681faaaa..1e6e2abde428 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -691,7 +691,8 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
> > }
> >
> > - if (check_amd_hwpstate_cpu(cpu) && !acpi_pstate_strict) {
> > + if (check_amd_hwpstate_cpu(cpu) && (c->x86 < 0x19) &&
>
> Why don't you use boot_cpu_data instead of *c?
Thanks for your review. c->x86 contains the same level of information as boot_cpu_data when
acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init() starts to execute. But you are right, it is better to use boot_cpu_data,
consistent with the rest code in the same function.
>
> And why don't you do the extra check in check_amd_hwpstate_cpu()?
check_amd_hwpstate_cpu() is called at various locations. This _PSD fix doesn't apply at
other callers.
>
> Also the parens around it are not necessary here and is there any
I will remove it in the next rev.
> chance for having a proper symbol instead of the raw 0x19 in that
> check?
Unfortunately I didn't find a replacement. Only x86_vendor has an acronym. The rest
(fam/model/stepping) use numerical values, including in arch/x86 boot code.
>
> > + !acpi_pstate_strict) {
> > cpumask_clear(policy->cpus);
> > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
> > cpumask_copy(data->freqdomain_cpus,
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-16 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-07 20:44 [PATCH 1/1] acpi-cpufreq: Honor _PSD table setting in CPU frequency control Wei Huang
2020-10-16 14:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-16 16:08 ` Wei Huang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201016160824.GA63297@weilap \
--to=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox