From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B77AC4363D for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 03:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED83620738 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 03:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2411764AbgJUD2V (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:28:21 -0400 Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:44132 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2411752AbgJUD2U (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:28:20 -0400 Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09L3RPu1000409; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 05:27:25 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 05:27:25 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Amit Klein , George Spelvin , Eric Dumazet , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , "Theodore Ts'o" , Florian Westphal , Marc Plumb , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] prandom32 changes for v5.10 Message-ID: <20201021032725.GB396@1wt.eu> References: <20201012203226.GA11861@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 04:08:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:26 PM Amit Klein wrote: > > > > Quick question: is this patch still planned for inclusion in 5.10-rc1? > > It doesn't even build for me, so no. It clearly hasn't been in > linux-next or anything like that. > > Hint: grep for prandom_seed_early. I'm a bit surprised, as it worked for me, but thanks for checking. Given the lack of responses from many participants on these patches, on several occations I feel that this series is really not welcome. Initially I just tried to test and fix Spelvin's patch, but if there's not that much interest in it, or even reluctance, I'd rather stop. If it's just that the current state is ugly with the two PRNGs side by side, I can get back to completely removing the original one as I did in my first series, and propose a larger series. Or if nobody's interested, I'd rather know so that I don't have to put more time on it :-/ Thanks for letting me know, Willy