From: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched_debug: remove the param dl_rq in print_dl_rq()
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:09:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201021140958.GA138139@rlk> (raw)
different from rt_sched_class and fair_sched_class,
dl_sched_class have no sched group.
We can direct get dl_rq according to cpu, so remove the
param dl_rq in print_dl_rq().
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/debug.c | 3 ++-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 6d93f4518734..dd9bf5684df9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -2885,6 +2885,6 @@ bool dl_cpu_busy(unsigned int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
void print_dl_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
{
- print_dl_rq(m, cpu, &cpu_rq(cpu)->dl);
+ print_dl_rq(m, cpu);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 0655524700d2..2f0166828638 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -640,9 +640,10 @@ void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
#undef P
}
-void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
+void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
{
struct dl_bw *dl_bw;
+ struct dl_rq *dl_rq = &cpu_rq(cpu)->dl;
SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
SEQ_printf(m, "dl_rq[%d]:\n", cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 28709f6b0975..e01c3391e386 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2261,7 +2261,7 @@ extern void print_rt_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu);
extern void print_dl_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu);
extern void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
extern void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
-extern void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct dl_rq *dl_rq);
+extern void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
extern void
show_numa_stats(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m);
--
2.25.1
reply other threads:[~2020-10-21 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201021140958.GA138139@rlk \
--to=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox