public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Trilok Soni <tsoni@codeaurora.org>,
	Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: Add bootcpus parameter to boot subset of CPUs
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:45:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201023074542.GN2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1603404243-5536-1-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 03:04:03PM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> In a heterogeneous multiprocessor system, specifying the 'maxcpus'
> parameter on kernel command line does not provide sufficient control
> over which CPUs are brought online at kernel boot time, since CPUs may
> have nonuniform performance characteristics. Thus, add bootcpus kernel
> parameter to control which CPUs should be brought online during kernel
> boot. When both maxcpus and bootcpus is set, the more restrictive of the
> two are booted.

Why would one wish to do so? Having the ability for abilities sake is no
good.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-23  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-22 22:04 [PATCH] smp: Add bootcpus parameter to boot subset of CPUs Elliot Berman
2020-10-23  7:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-10-23 21:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-26 17:08   ` psodagud
2020-10-26 17:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-27 17:06       ` Elliot Berman
2020-10-28 14:55         ` Qais Yousef
2020-10-28 15:15           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-29 21:37             ` Elliot Berman
2020-10-30 17:45               ` Sudeep Holla
2020-11-03 22:10                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-26 19:04     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-25 13:06 ` Qais Yousef
2020-10-28 15:55 ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201023074542.GN2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=eberman@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox