From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+53f8ce8bbc07924b6417@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible code in trace_hardirqs_on
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:18:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201023081847.GO2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201022163247.5bb93ab3@gandalf.local.home>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:32:47PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:30:28 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > Subject: lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious IRQ-enable
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Date: Thu Oct 22 12:23:02 CEST 2020
> >
> > It is valid (albeit uncommon) to call local_irq_enable() without first
> > having called local_irq_disable(). In this case we enter
> > lockdep_hardirqs_on*() with IRQs enabled and trip a preemption warning
> > for using __this_cpu_read().
> >
> > Use this_cpu_read() instead to avoid the warning.
>
> I was wondering why you were using __this_cpu_read() in the first place.
Well, because all other sites are actually with IRQs disabled :/ It's
just this spurious enable thing that's an exception.
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-23 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-13 11:22 BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible code in trace_hardirqs_on syzbot
2020-10-13 13:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-10-21 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-21 14:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-10-21 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-21 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-10-22 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-22 20:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-10-23 8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-10-16 17:16 ` syzbot
2020-10-16 20:33 ` syzbot
2020-10-21 13:09 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201023081847.GO2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=syzbot+53f8ce8bbc07924b6417@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox