From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
fweisbec@gmail.com, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/6] rcu/segcblist: Add counters to segcblist datastructure
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 01:32:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201026003212.GA104441@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201021190813.3005054-3-joel@joelfernandes.org>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 03:08:09PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> @@ -307,6 +317,7 @@ void rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
>
> if (!rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(rsclp))
> return; /* Nothing to do. */
> + rclp->len = rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, RCU_DONE_TAIL);
I realize, doesn't it break the unsegmented count in srcu_invoke_callbacks() ?
It still does rcu_segcblist_insert_count(), so it adds zero to rsclp->len
which thus doesn't get cleared and probably keeps growing.
At least srcu_barrier() relies on it. And module exit should warn.
> *rclp->tail = rsclp->head;
> WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->head, *rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL]);
> WRITE_ONCE(*rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL], NULL);
> @@ -314,6 +325,7 @@ void rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
> for (i = RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS - 1; i >= RCU_DONE_TAIL; i--)
> if (rsclp->tails[i] == rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL])
> WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->tails[i], &rsclp->head);
> + rcu_segcblist_set_seglen(rsclp, RCU_DONE_TAIL, 0);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -330,11 +342,16 @@ void rcu_segcblist_extract_pend_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
>
> if (!rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(rsclp))
> return; /* Nothing to do. */
> + rclp->len = rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, RCU_WAIT_TAIL) +
> + rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL) +
> + rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, RCU_NEXT_TAIL);
> *rclp->tail = *rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL];
> rclp->tail = rsclp->tails[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
> WRITE_ONCE(*rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL], NULL);
> - for (i = RCU_DONE_TAIL + 1; i < RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS; i++)
> + for (i = RCU_DONE_TAIL + 1; i < RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS; i++) {
> WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->tails[i], rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL]);
> + rcu_segcblist_set_seglen(rsclp, i, 0);
You seem to have forgotten the suggestion?
rclp->len += rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, i)
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-21 19:08 [PATCH v8 0/6] Add support for length of each segment in the segcblist Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] rcu/tree: Make rcu_do_batch count how many callbacks were executed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] rcu/segcblist: Add counters to segcblist datastructure Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26 0:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2020-10-26 5:40 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-26 11:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-27 17:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-26 0:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-26 5:45 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-26 11:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] rcu/trace: Add tracing for how segcb list changes Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26 11:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-11-03 13:47 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-05 3:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] rcu/segcblist: Remove useless rcupdate.h include Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] rcu/tree: segcblist: Remove redundant smp_mb()s Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26 12:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] rcu/segcblist: Add additional comments to explain smp_mb() Joel Fernandes (Google)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201026003212.GA104441@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox