From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
fweisbec@gmail.com, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/6] rcu/segcblist: Add counters to segcblist datastructure
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 01:40:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201026054043.GA4192074@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201026003212.GA104441@lothringen>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:32:12AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 03:08:09PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > @@ -307,6 +317,7 @@ void rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
> >
> > if (!rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(rsclp))
> > return; /* Nothing to do. */
> > + rclp->len = rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, RCU_DONE_TAIL);
>
> I realize, doesn't it break the unsegmented count in srcu_invoke_callbacks() ?
>
> It still does rcu_segcblist_insert_count(), so it adds zero to rsclp->len
> which thus doesn't get cleared and probably keeps growing.
You are right. This needs changing :-( Its my fault, I did not test SRCU
torture tests which are indeed failing.
I fixed it with the diff attached to the end of the email and will test it
more.
> > *rclp->tail = rsclp->head;
> > WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->head, *rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL]);
> > WRITE_ONCE(*rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL], NULL);
> > @@ -314,6 +325,7 @@ void rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
> > for (i = RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS - 1; i >= RCU_DONE_TAIL; i--)
> > if (rsclp->tails[i] == rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL])
> > WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->tails[i], &rsclp->head);
> > + rcu_segcblist_set_seglen(rsclp, RCU_DONE_TAIL, 0);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -330,11 +342,16 @@ void rcu_segcblist_extract_pend_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
> >
> > if (!rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(rsclp))
> > return; /* Nothing to do. */
> > + rclp->len = rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, RCU_WAIT_TAIL) +
> > + rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL) +
> > + rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, RCU_NEXT_TAIL);
> > *rclp->tail = *rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL];
> > rclp->tail = rsclp->tails[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
> > WRITE_ONCE(*rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL], NULL);
> > - for (i = RCU_DONE_TAIL + 1; i < RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS; i++)
> > + for (i = RCU_DONE_TAIL + 1; i < RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS; i++) {
> > WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->tails[i], rsclp->tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL]);
> > + rcu_segcblist_set_seglen(rsclp, i, 0);
>
> You seem to have forgotten the suggestion?
>
> rclp->len += rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, i)
I decided to keep it this way as I did not see how it could be better.
You mentioned you are Ok with either option so I left it as is.
Thanks!
- Joel
---8<-----------------------
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 0f23d20d485a..79b7081143a7 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -1160,6 +1160,7 @@ static void srcu_advance_state(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
*/
static void srcu_invoke_callbacks(struct work_struct *work)
{
+ long len;
bool more;
struct rcu_cblist ready_cbs;
struct rcu_head *rhp;
@@ -1182,6 +1183,7 @@ static void srcu_invoke_callbacks(struct work_struct *work)
/* We are on the job! Extract and invoke ready callbacks. */
sdp->srcu_cblist_invoking = true;
rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist, &ready_cbs);
+ len = ready_cbs.len;
spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(sdp);
rhp = rcu_cblist_dequeue(&ready_cbs);
for (; rhp != NULL; rhp = rcu_cblist_dequeue(&ready_cbs)) {
@@ -1190,13 +1192,14 @@ static void srcu_invoke_callbacks(struct work_struct *work)
rhp->func(rhp);
local_bh_enable();
}
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(ready_cbs.len);
/*
* Update counts, accelerate new callbacks, and if needed,
* schedule another round of callback invocation.
*/
spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(sdp);
- rcu_segcblist_insert_count(&sdp->srcu_cblist, &ready_cbs);
+ rcu_segcblist_add_len(&sdp->srcu_cblist, -len);
(void)rcu_segcblist_accelerate(&sdp->srcu_cblist,
rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq));
sdp->srcu_cblist_invoking = false;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-21 19:08 [PATCH v8 0/6] Add support for length of each segment in the segcblist Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] rcu/tree: Make rcu_do_batch count how many callbacks were executed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] rcu/segcblist: Add counters to segcblist datastructure Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26 0:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-26 5:40 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2020-10-26 11:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-27 17:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-26 0:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-26 5:45 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-26 11:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] rcu/trace: Add tracing for how segcb list changes Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26 11:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-11-03 13:47 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-05 3:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] rcu/segcblist: Remove useless rcupdate.h include Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] rcu/tree: segcblist: Remove redundant smp_mb()s Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26 12:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-10-21 19:08 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] rcu/segcblist: Add additional comments to explain smp_mb() Joel Fernandes (Google)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201026054043.GA4192074@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox