Re: [tip: locking/core] lockdep: Fix usage_traceoverflow

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:30:56PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This seems to make it happy. Not quite sure that's the best solution.
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index 3e99dfef8408..81295bc760fe 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -4411,7 +4405,9 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
>  		break;
>  
>  	case LOCK_USED:
> -		debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks);
> +	case LOCK_USED_READ:
> +		if ((hlock_class(this)->usage_mask & (LOCKF_USED|LOCKF_USED_READ)) == new_mask)
> +			debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks);
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:

This also works, and I think I likes it better.. anyone?

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 3e99dfef8408..e603e86c0227 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4396,6 +4390,9 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 	if (unlikely(hlock_class(this)->usage_mask & new_mask))
 		goto unlock;
 
+	if (!hlock_class(this)->usage_mask)
+		debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks);
+
 	hlock_class(this)->usage_mask |= new_mask;
 
 	if (new_bit < LOCK_TRACE_STATES) {
@@ -4403,19 +4400,10 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 			return 0;
 	}
 
-	switch (new_bit) {
-	case 0 ... LOCK_USED-1:
+	if (new_bit < LOCK_USED) {
 		ret = mark_lock_irq(curr, this, new_bit);
 		if (!ret)
 			return 0;
-		break;
-
-	case LOCK_USED:
-		debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks);
-		break;
-
-	default:
-		break;
 	}
 
 unlock: