From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/build: Fix vmlinux size check on 64-bit
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:08:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201027200803.GL15580@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201005151539.2214095-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:15:39AM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> Commit b4e0409a36f4 ("x86: check vmlinux limits, 64-bit") added a check
> that the size of the 64-bit kernel is less than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE.
>
> The check uses (_end - _text), but this is not enough. The initial PMD
> used in startup_64() (level2_kernel_pgt) can only map upto
> KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE from __START_KERNEL_map, not from _text.
>
> The correct check is the same as for 32-bit, since LOAD_OFFSET is
> defined appropriately for the two architectures. Just check
> (_end - LOAD_OFFSET) against KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE unconditionally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 11 ++---------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> index bf9e0adb5b7e..b38832821b98 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> @@ -454,13 +454,12 @@ SECTIONS
> ASSERT(SIZEOF(.rela.dyn) == 0, "Unexpected run-time relocations (.rela) detected!")
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> /*
> * The ASSERT() sink to . is intentional, for binutils 2.14 compatibility:
> */
> . = ASSERT((_end - LOAD_OFFSET <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
> "kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE");
> -#else
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> /*
> * Per-cpu symbols which need to be offset from __per_cpu_load
> * for the boot processor.
> @@ -470,18 +469,12 @@ INIT_PER_CPU(gdt_page);
> INIT_PER_CPU(fixed_percpu_data);
> INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_backing_store);
>
> -/*
> - * Build-time check on the image size:
> - */
> -. = ASSERT((_end - _text <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
> - "kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE");
So we have this:
SECTIONS
{
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
. = LOAD_OFFSET + LOAD_PHYSICAL_ADDR;
phys_startup_32 = ABSOLUTE(startup_32 - LOAD_OFFSET);
#else
. = __START_KERNEL;
^^^^^^^^^^
which sets the location counter to
#define __START_KERNEL (__START_KERNEL_map + __PHYSICAL_START)
which is 0xffffffff80000000 + ALIGN(CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START, CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN)
and that second term after the '+' has effect only when
CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=n and that's not really used on modern kernel configs
as RELOCATABLE is selected by EFI_STUB and RANDOMIZE_BASE depends on at
and and ...
So IOW, in a usual .config we have:
__START_KERNEL_map at 0xffffffff80000000
_text at 0xffffffff81000000
So practically and for the majority of configs, the kernel image really
does start at _text and not at __START_KERNEL_map and we map 16Mb which
is 4 PMDs of unused pages. So basically you're correcting that here -
that the number tested against KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE is 16Mb more.
Yes, no?
Or am I missing some more important aspect and this is more than just a
small correctness fixlet?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-27 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-05 15:15 [PATCH] x86/build: Fix vmlinux size check on 64-bit Arvind Sankar
2020-10-27 20:08 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-10-27 21:14 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-28 13:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-10-28 16:45 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-28 19:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-10-28 20:45 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-29 16:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Arvind Sankar
2020-10-29 21:02 ` [tip: x86/build] " tip-bot2 for Arvind Sankar
2020-10-29 20:05 ` [PATCH] " Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201027200803.GL15580@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox