public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>,
	urezki@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] rcu/tree: Use delayed work instead of hrtimer to refill the cache
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 21:22:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201029202241.GA24399@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201029201342.GA24122@pc636>

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 09:13:42PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:47:24PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 05:50:19PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > > A CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is unconditionally enabled, thus a page
> > > can be obtained directly from a kvfree_rcu() path. To distinguish
> > > that and take a decision the preemptable() macro is used when it
> > > is save to enter allocator.
> > > 
> > > It means that refilling a cache is not important from timing point
> > > of view. Switch to a delayed work, so the actual work is queued from
> > > the timer interrupt with 1 jiffy delay. An immediate placing a task
> > > on a current CPU can lead to rq->lock double lock. That is why a
> > > delayed method is in place.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Thank you, Uladzislau!
> > 
> > I applied this on top of v5.10-rc1 and got the following from the
> > single-CPU builds:
> > 
> >   SYNC    include/config/auto.conf.cmd
> >   DESCEND  objtool
> >   CC      kernel/bounds.s
> >   CALL    scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
> >   UPD     include/generated/bounds.h
> >   CC      arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
> > In file included from ./include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:20:0,
> >                  from ./include/linux/atomic.h:82,
> >                  from ./include/linux/crypto.h:15,
> >                  from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9:
> > ./include/linux/pagemap.h: In function ‘__page_cache_add_speculative’:
> > ./include/linux/build_bug.h:30:34: error: called object is not a function or function pointer
> >  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e))))
> >                                  ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ./include/linux/mmdebug.h:45:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID’
> >  #define VM_BUG_ON(cond) BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(cond)
> >                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ./include/linux/pagemap.h:207:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘VM_BUG_ON’
> >   VM_BUG_ON(preemptible())
> >   ^~~~~~~~~
> > scripts/Makefile.build:117: recipe for target 'arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s' failed
> > make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
> > Makefile:1199: recipe for target 'prepare0' failed
> > make: *** [prepare0] Error 2
> > 
> > I vaguely recall something like this showing up in the previous series
> > and that we did something or another to address it.  Could you please
> > check against the old series at -rcu branch dev.2020.10.22a?  (I verified
> > that the old series does run correctly in the single-CPU scenarios.)
> > 
> I see the same build error. Will double check if we have similar in the
> previous series also. It looks like the error is caused by the Thomas series.
> 
> Will check!
> 
OK. Found it:

urezki@pc638:~/data/coding/linux.git$ git diff
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index cbfbe2bcca75..7dd3523093db 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr);
 static inline int __page_cache_add_speculative(struct page *page, int count)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
-       VM_BUG_ON(preemptible())
+       VM_BUG_ON(preemptible());
        /*
         * Preempt must be disabled here - we rely on rcu_read_lock doing
         * this for us.
urezki@pc638:~/data/coding/linux.git$

I guess we had some extra patch that fixes a kernel compilation for !SMP
case. Will check dev.2020.10.22a.

--
Vlad Rezki

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-29 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-29 16:50 [PATCH 01/16] rcu/tree: Add a work to allocate pages from regular context Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 02/16] lib/debug: Remove pointless ARCH_NO_PREEMPT dependencies Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 03/16] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 04/16] preempt: Cleanup PREEMPT_COUNT leftovers Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 05/16] lockdep: " Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 06/16] mm/pagemap: " Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 20:57   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-10-29 21:26     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 07/16] locking/bitspinlock: " Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 08/16] uaccess: " Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 09/16] sched: " Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 10/16] ARM: " Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 11/16] xtensa: " Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915: " Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 13/16] rcutorture: " Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 14/16] preempt: Remove PREEMPT_COUNT from Kconfig Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 15/16] rcu/tree: Allocate a page when caller is preemptible Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-11-03 18:03   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-04 11:39     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-11-04 14:36       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-29 16:50 ` [PATCH 16/16] rcu/tree: Use delayed work instead of hrtimer to refill the cache Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-10-29 19:47   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-29 20:13     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-10-29 20:22       ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2020-10-29 20:33         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-29 21:00           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-11-03 15:47 ` [PATCH 01/16] rcu/tree: Add a work to allocate pages from regular context Joel Fernandes
2020-11-03 16:33   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-11-03 19:18     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-04 12:35       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-11-04 14:12         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-04 14:40           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-11-03 17:54 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-04 12:12   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-11-04 15:01     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-04 18:38       ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201029202241.GA24399@pc636 \
    --to=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox