From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D835AC2D0A3 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 12:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8449A22384 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 12:17:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604405841; bh=Z3eCA/9DRelOW4zpEpE9pkZnNliO73On3+mtonpzA2U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=ChFH3cdjwNRj3XXIcb8M4Ly1xHCtmLGFfllKyCsv/qWST85NP+sLkOe46XRBQ6eds /3NaTwQizXvnRnC4U8G7oJGMU98wRr/v0Z756du2hgnvwghnW7ePE60Kp/XqkBdcmF Azw4uJKQRkVyb/mO5SEUBEPBEes1qpKw5NowdiIE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728991AbgKCMRT (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2020 07:17:19 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38136 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728168AbgKCMRR (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2020 07:17:17 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86B1421D40; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 12:17:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604405837; bh=Z3eCA/9DRelOW4zpEpE9pkZnNliO73On3+mtonpzA2U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RQvNDlxf6/k54kQsc1UBNMUH3N9HWztXRpwqlgq1j51NcKv7ZAC8SSb+xdQgMPAuF buO88ps97RtLRONiO1s25SeNnWYnAYaHj75imqUYovJ8+z5qJehBmBoHqRzwK0/tRw eh7HARSL4w6HrOdrl8iYCPEZjvuFmyzgs7PLOSkA= Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 13:18:10 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>, Brendan Higgins , Shuah Khan , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky , Rasmus Villemoes , Alexandre Belloni , Randy Dunlap , Ilya Dryomov , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib: Convert test_printf.c to KUnit Message-ID: <20201103121810.GA1054984@kroah.com> References: <20201103111049.51916-1-98.arpi@gmail.com> <20201103113353.GC4077@smile.fi.intel.com> <20201103115223.GA268796@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 02:06:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:54 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 04:40:49PM +0530, Arpitha Raghunandan wrote: > > ... > > > > Better, indeed. > > > > > > But can be this improved to have a cumulative statistics, like showing only > > > number of total, succeeded, failed with details of the latter ones? > > > > Is that the proper test output format? We have a standard... > > I dunno. I'm asking... > We have few possibilities here: a) let it go like above, b) use the > cumulative statistics, c) if there is no such available, implement and > use it, d) ... We have a standard, please use it. greg k-h