From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
fweisbec@gmail.com, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/7] rcu/tree: Make rcu_do_batch count how many callbacks were executed
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:05:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201104000554.GF3249@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201103142603.1302207-2-joel@joelfernandes.org>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:25:57AM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> Currently, rcu_do_batch() depends on the unsegmented callback list's len field
> to know how many CBs are executed. This fields counts down from 0 as CBs are
> dequeued. It is possible that all CBs could not be run because of reaching
> limits in which case the remaining unexecuted callbacks are requeued in the
> CPU's segcblist.
>
> The number of callbacks that were not requeued are then the negative count (how
> many CBs were run) stored in the rcl->len which has been counting down on every
> dequeue. This negative count is then added to the per-cpu segmented callback
> list's to correct its count.
>
> Such a design works against future efforts to track the length of each segment
> of the segmented callback list. The reason is because
> rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs() will be populating the unsegmented callback
> list's length field (rcl->len) during extraction.
>
> Also, the design of counting down from 0 is confusing and error-prone IMHO.
>
> This commit therefore explicitly counts how many callbacks were executed in
> rcu_do_batch() itself, and uses that to update the per-CPU segcb list's ->len
> field, without relying on the negativity of rcl->len.
>
> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Queued for testing and further review, thank you all!
I will be pulling these in as I look them over, and running tests
in between times, so this will take some time.
As usual, I could not resist editing the commit log, so please
see below to check whether I messed something up.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit d77ef2684cbff728c14b3c84a356139c52ca3a5e
Author: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Tue Nov 3 09:25:57 2020 -0500
rcu/tree: Make rcu_do_batch count how many callbacks were executed
The rcu_do_batch() function extracts the ready-to-invoke callbacks
from the rcu_segcblist located in the ->cblist field of the current
CPU's rcu_data structure. These callbacks are first moved to a local
(unsegmented) rcu_cblist. The rcu_do_batch() function then uses this
rcu_cblist's ->len field to count how many CBs it has invoked, but it
does so by counting that field down from zero. Finally, this function
negates the value in this ->len field (resulting in a positive number)
and subtracts the result from the ->len field of the current CPU's
->cblist field.
Except that it is sometimes necessary for rcu_do_batch() to stop invoking
callbacks mid-stream, despite there being more ready to invoke, for
example, if a high-priority task wakes up. In this case the remaining
not-yet-invoked callbacks are requeued back onto the CPU's ->cblist,
but remain in the ready-to-invoke segment of that list. As above, the
negative of the local rcu_cblist's ->len field is still subtracted from
the ->len field of the current CPU's ->cblist field.
The design of counting down from 0 is confusing and error-prone, plus
use of a positive count will make it easier to provide a uniform and
consistent API to deal with the per-segment counts that are added
later in this series. For example, rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs()
can unconditionally populate the resulting unsegmented list's ->len
field during extraction.
This commit therefore explicitly counts how many callbacks were executed
in rcu_do_batch() itself, counting up from zero, and then uses that
to update the per-CPU segcb list's ->len field, without relying on the
downcounting of rcl->len from zero.
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
index 2d2a6b6b9..bb246d8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void rcu_segcblist_set_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
* This increase is fully ordered with respect to the callers accesses
* both before and after.
*/
-static void rcu_segcblist_add_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
+void rcu_segcblist_add_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* Up to the caller! */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
index 492262b..1d2d614 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static inline bool rcu_segcblist_restempty(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, int seg)
}
void rcu_segcblist_inc_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp);
+void rcu_segcblist_add_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v);
void rcu_segcblist_init(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp);
void rcu_segcblist_disable(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp);
void rcu_segcblist_offload(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index b6ec565..c4035e7 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2436,7 +2436,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
const bool offloaded = rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist);
struct rcu_head *rhp;
struct rcu_cblist rcl = RCU_CBLIST_INITIALIZER(rcl);
- long bl, count;
+ long bl, count = 0;
long pending, tlimit = 0;
/* If no callbacks are ready, just return. */
@@ -2481,6 +2481,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
for (; rhp; rhp = rcu_cblist_dequeue(&rcl)) {
rcu_callback_t f;
+ count++;
debug_rcu_head_unqueue(rhp);
rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_callback_map);
@@ -2494,15 +2495,14 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
/*
* Stop only if limit reached and CPU has something to do.
- * Note: The rcl structure counts down from zero.
*/
- if (-rcl.len >= bl && !offloaded &&
+ if (count >= bl && !offloaded &&
(need_resched() ||
(!is_idle_task(current) && !rcu_is_callbacks_kthread())))
break;
if (unlikely(tlimit)) {
/* only call local_clock() every 32 callbacks */
- if (likely((-rcl.len & 31) || local_clock() < tlimit))
+ if (likely((count & 31) || local_clock() < tlimit))
continue;
/* Exceeded the time limit, so leave. */
break;
@@ -2519,7 +2519,6 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
local_irq_save(flags);
rcu_nocb_lock(rdp);
- count = -rcl.len;
rdp->n_cbs_invoked += count;
trace_rcu_batch_end(rcu_state.name, count, !!rcl.head, need_resched(),
is_idle_task(current), rcu_is_callbacks_kthread());
@@ -2527,7 +2526,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
/* Update counts and requeue any remaining callbacks. */
rcu_segcblist_insert_done_cbs(&rdp->cblist, &rcl);
smp_mb(); /* List handling before counting for rcu_barrier(). */
- rcu_segcblist_insert_count(&rdp->cblist, &rcl);
+ rcu_segcblist_add_len(&rdp->cblist, -count);
/* Reinstate batch limit if we have worked down the excess. */
count = rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-04 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 14:25 [PATCH v9 0/7] Add support for length of each segment in the segcblist Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-03 14:25 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] rcu/tree: Make rcu_do_batch count how many callbacks were executed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-04 0:05 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2020-11-04 15:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-03 14:25 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] rcu/segcblist: Add counters to segcblist datastructure Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-04 13:37 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2020-11-04 17:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-07 0:01 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-07 0:18 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-07 0:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-10 1:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-03 14:25 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] srcu: Fix invoke_rcu_callbacks() segcb length adjustment Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-03 14:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-11-03 14:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-03 15:07 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-03 15:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-03 15:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-11-04 13:37 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2020-11-03 14:26 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] rcu/trace: Add tracing for how segcb list changes Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-03 15:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-11-04 14:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-04 14:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-11-07 0:05 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-04 13:40 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2020-11-04 15:05 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-11 0:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-11 13:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-11-11 14:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-03 14:26 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] rcu/segcblist: Remove useless rcupdate.h include Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-05 3:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-05 14:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-07 0:27 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-03 14:26 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] rcu/tree: segcblist: Remove redundant smp_mb()s Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-05 3:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-07 0:26 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-10 1:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-03 14:26 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] rcu/segcblist: Add additional comments to explain smp_mb() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-05 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-06 22:41 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-10 1:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201104000554.GF3249@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox