From: paulmck@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/2] x86/cpu: Avoid cpuinfo-induced IPIing of idle CPUs
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:01:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201105230123.18308-2-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201105230040.GA18202@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Currently, accessing /proc/cpuinfo sends IPIs to idle CPUs in order to
learn their clock frequency. Which is a bit strange, given that waking
them from idle likely significantly changes their clock frequency.
This commit therefore avoids sending /proc/cpuinfo-induced IPIs to
idle CPUs.
[ paulmck: Also check for idle in arch_freq_prepare_all(). ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c | 6 ++++++
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 2 ++
include/linux/rcutree.h | 1 +
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 ++++++++
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
index 37ff7f4..47af9b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include "cpu.h"
@@ -93,6 +94,9 @@ unsigned int aperfmperf_get_khz(int cpu)
if (!housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_FLAG_MISC))
return 0;
+ if (rcu_is_idle_cpu(cpu))
+ return 0; /* Idle CPUs are completely uninteresting. */
+
aperfmperf_snapshot_cpu(cpu, ktime_get(), true);
return per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
}
@@ -112,6 +116,8 @@ void arch_freq_prepare_all(void)
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
if (!housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_FLAG_MISC))
continue;
+ if (rcu_is_idle_cpu(cpu))
+ continue; /* Idle CPUs are completely uninteresting. */
if (!aperfmperf_snapshot_cpu(cpu, now, false))
wait = true;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index 7c1ecdb..2a97334 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ static inline void rcu_irq_enter_irqson(void) { }
static inline void rcu_irq_exit(void) { }
static inline void rcu_irq_exit_preempt(void) { }
static inline void rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt(void) { }
+#define rcu_is_idle_cpu(cpu) \
+ (is_idle_task(current) && !in_nmi() && !in_irq() && !in_serving_softirq())
static inline void exit_rcu(void) { }
static inline bool rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 59eb5cd..df578b7 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ void rcu_irq_exit(void);
void rcu_irq_exit_preempt(void);
void rcu_irq_enter_irqson(void);
void rcu_irq_exit_irqson(void);
+bool rcu_is_idle_cpu(int cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
void rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt(void);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 06895ef..1d84c0b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -341,6 +341,14 @@ static bool rcu_dynticks_in_eqs(int snap)
return !(snap & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR);
}
+/* Return true if the specified CPU is currently idle from an RCU viewpoint. */
+bool rcu_is_idle_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+
+ return rcu_dynticks_in_eqs(rcu_dynticks_snap(rdp));
+}
+
/*
* Return true if the CPU corresponding to the specified rcu_data
* structure has spent some time in an extended quiescent state since
--
2.9.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-05 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-05 23:00 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/2] smp_call_function updates for v5.11 Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-05 23:01 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/2] x86/cpu: Avoid cpuinfo-induced IPI pileups paulmck
2020-11-05 23:01 ` paulmck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201105230123.18308-2-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox