From: paulmck@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/7] rcu: Un-hide lockdep maps for !LOCKDEP
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:24:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201105232454.19919-2-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201105232345.GA19179@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Currently, variables used only within lockdep expressions are flagged as
unused, requiring that these variables' declarations be decorated with
either #ifdef or __maybe_unused. This results in ugly code. This commit
therefore causes the RCU lock maps to be visible even when lockdep is not
enabled, thus removing the need for these decorations. This approach
further relies on dead-code elimination to remove any references to
functions or variables that are not available in non-lockdep kernels.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 9 +++++----
include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 6cdd015..f9533bb 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -241,6 +241,11 @@ bool rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online(void);
static inline bool rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online(void) { return true; }
#endif /* #else #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) */
+extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
+extern struct lockdep_map rcu_bh_lock_map;
+extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
+extern struct lockdep_map rcu_callback_map;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
static inline void rcu_lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *map)
@@ -253,10 +258,6 @@ static inline void rcu_lock_release(struct lockdep_map *map)
lock_release(map, _THIS_IP_);
}
-extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
-extern struct lockdep_map rcu_bh_lock_map;
-extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
-extern struct lockdep_map rcu_callback_map;
int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
int rcu_read_lock_held(void);
int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void);
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h b/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h
index 3e7919f..86c8f6c 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate_trace.h
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_trace_lock_map;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+
static inline int rcu_read_lock_trace_held(void)
{
return lock_is_held(&rcu_trace_lock_map);
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-05 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-05 23:23 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/7] Lockdep-RCU updates for v5.11 Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-05 23:24 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/7] sched: Un-hide lockdep_tasklist_lock_is_held() for !LOCKDEP paulmck
2020-11-05 23:24 ` paulmck [this message]
2020-11-05 23:24 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/7] net: Un-hide lockdep_sock_is_held() " paulmck
2020-11-05 23:24 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/7] net: sched: Remove broken definitions and un-hide " paulmck
2020-11-05 23:24 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/7] srcu: Use a more appropriate lockdep helper paulmck
2020-11-05 23:24 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] lockdep: Provide dummy forward declaration of *_is_held() helpers paulmck
2020-11-05 23:24 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/7] rcu: Prevent RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() from swallowing the condition paulmck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201105232454.19919-2-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox