From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, sstabellini@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dustymabe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/xen: fix warning when running with nosmt mitigations
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 19:47:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106004743.GA380136@tp-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106003529.391649-1-bmasney@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 07:35:29PM -0500, Brian Masney wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> index 799f4eba0a62..4a052459a08e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> @@ -93,9 +93,24 @@ void xen_init_lock_cpu(int cpu)
>
> void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu)
> {
> + int irq;
> +
> if (!xen_pvspin)
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * When booting the kernel with 'mitigations=auto,nosmt', the secondary
> + * CPUs are not activated and only the primary thread on each CPU core
> + * is used. In this situation, xen_hvm_smp_prepare_cpus(), and more
> + * importantly xen_init_lock_cpu(), is not called, so the
> + * lock_kicker_irq is not initialized for the secondary CPUs. Let's
> + * exit early if the irq is not set to avoid a warning in the console
> + * log.
> + */
> + irq = per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu);
> + if (irq == -1)
> + return;
> +
> unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu), NULL);
As soon as I saw this on lore, I saw that I should have passed the irq
variable to unbind_from_irqhandler() rather than doing another per_cpu()
lookup. I'll wait for feedback about the general approach before posting
a v2.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-06 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-06 0:35 [PATCH] x86/xen: fix warning when running with nosmt mitigations Brian Masney
2020-11-06 0:47 ` Brian Masney [this message]
2020-11-07 0:44 ` boris.ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201106004743.GA380136@tp-x1 \
--to=bmasney@redhat.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dustymabe@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox