From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF12C2D0A3 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0099A2087E for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="lehKZzcT" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727475AbgKFOdM (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:33:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44514 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726565AbgKFOdL (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:33:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com (mail-wr1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3F6C0613CF for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 06:33:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id p8so739723wrx.5 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 06:33:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=DyXfDDWSKwU8s+VIA5hQfPeuUhLrKjIyJ35kol6OQUw=; b=lehKZzcTDVaoI0brWupnB6wN/qt2ttOEp1rS+RgjR1ypgpVb6yQSS0va6bulWe9XS7 49dYfYmOtXqSXUoC6m1qZQXzzOH2LXgk7vvKkpDtIq8GWgAlJTxsGPe5+7Q4H4zJhgT2 6U9lKG92h/MhuszreEY+6XBYNoAivhPmsyv+5MCbKi4oVH7Uvfm8gjYiWYaGptUy6RIg UrEg4dFKmYf7AfsEe/q81H2ef+eELFpkInuUwY1IfSj1p4CwkjRLSKYYrle4xyyYvOOQ zvROXxZTgAuWXRyqLo+hvKDIj/OBe0oXWwx63uQRTCKBxKi6jkx7Wc0wFVezM0ZYGVuu a3nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=DyXfDDWSKwU8s+VIA5hQfPeuUhLrKjIyJ35kol6OQUw=; b=XFPEslPjmiF+YAW/diZBdHD5adLY8OUZeDxvXEjHtSCDzzAjiCzaWXhmA5q5F2pVT6 9RmE/+ZO3twgwkPRhwrrnJAN0OU0oHv2QCFH9gx7351Lm/6OtggqymKXMIJGLxctAEjs Yinnxq8h1toZomslnfcpeTUEz1mSezD2wIgXHXam7Ud25XiBQ54C74uzBqjpyPVgaFL+ ROcTwmaTxw9w5lvxD/fyCqNz5nRY2r+R/N22Jq+2AepDD92nuV28Ru6UmUwbuu2GjESt Gqnc6cRI4WIvkehUBaCGsepgF3zAk65TVybayHF0im0/+9Jqldcb7CisdM2Wb/J+Q+AW MTVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532mgD07cD9TBb9vzFncey51FonFPTXZ6MYI8h8kVIJdaUuqUeHN YaAidBSI+s8/7CYz6ZK/kLjrVw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAEZ/j1smm7cvrpAIEJEB1BLq1MOwT4y7JoEF3M4exGNSO232kghjhVfLgpyA8EzWic1p5gQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fdc7:: with SMTP id i7mr3253347wrs.198.1604673189626; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 06:33:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y10sm2348316wru.94.2020.11.06.06.33.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 06 Nov 2020 06:33:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:33:07 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Miquel Raynal Cc: vigneshr@ti.com, richard@nod.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Rid W=1 warnings in MTD Message-ID: <20201106143307.GK2063125@dell> References: <20201102115406.1074327-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20201106133247.GI2063125@dell> <20201106144420.13c18b97@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20201106144420.13c18b97@xps13> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 06 Nov 2020, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Lee, > > Lee Jones wrote on Fri, 6 Nov 2020 13:32:47 > +0000: > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > > niggly little warnings. > > > > > > Lee Jones (23): > > > mtd: mtdpart: Fix misdocumented function parameter 'mtd' > > > mtd: devices: phram: File headers are not good candidates for > > > kernel-doc > > > mtd: nand: onenand: onenand_base: Fix expected kernel-doc formatting > > > mtd: devices: docg3: Fix kernel-doc 'bad line' and 'excessive doc' > > > issues > > > mtd: mtdcore: Fix misspelled function parameter 'section' > > > mtd: nand: onenand: onenand_bbt: Fix expected kernel-doc formatting > > > mtd: spi-nor: controllers: hisi-sfc: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc > > > mtd: ubi: build: Document 'ubi_num' in struct mtd_dev_param > > > mtd: nand: spi: toshiba: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc header > > > mtd: ubi: kapi: Correct documentation for 'ubi_leb_read_sg's 'sgl' > > > parameter > > > mtd: ubi: eba: Fix a couple of misdocumentation issues > > > mtd: ubi: wl: Fix a couple of kernel-doc issues > > > mtd: nand: raw: brcmnand: brcmnand: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc > > > headers > > > mtd: ubi: gluebi: Fix misnamed function parameter documentation > > > mtd: nand: raw: diskonchip: Marking unused variables as > > > __always_unused > > > mtd: nand: raw: cafe_nand: Remove superfluous param doc and add > > > another > > > mtd: nand: raw: s3c2410: Add documentation for 2 missing struct > > > members > > > mtd: nand: raw: omap_elm: Finish half populated function header, > > > demote empty ones > > > mtd: nand: raw: omap2: Fix a bunch of kernel-doc misdemeanours > > > mtd: nand: raw: sunxi_nand: Document 'sunxi_nfc's 'caps' member > > > mtd: nand: raw: arasan-nand-controller: Document 'anfc_op's 'buf' > > > member > > > mtd: nand: onenand: onenand_base: Fix some kernel-doc misdemeanours > > > mtd: devices: powernv_flash: Add function names to headers and fix > > > 'dev' > > > > May I ask; what is the plan for these patches please? > > > > Do you plan on taking the ones that do not require re-work, rather > > than fixing up and re-submitting the whole set. It would certainly > > save a lot of mailing list churn if that were the case. > > > > Either way, let me know and I will abide by your decision. > > > > I would prefer receiving a v2 with all the patches if you don't mind. No problem. Just so long as I know. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog