From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BD1C4742C for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8391C206E3 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726276AbgKKISH (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:18:07 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:39196 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726233AbgKKISD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:18:03 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 966BD6736F; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:18:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:18:00 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: hch@lst.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: simplify follow_pte{,pmd} Message-ID: <20201111081800.GA23492@lst.de> References: <20201029101432.47011-3-hch@lst.de> <20201111022122.1039505-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201111022122.1039505-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 06:21:22PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > Sorry, I think this patch may be causing a regression for us for s390? > https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/432129279#L768 > > (via https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20201029101432.47011-3-hch@lst.de) Hmm, the call to follow_pte_pmd in the s390 code does not actually exist in my tree.